Willingness to change car use under a tradable driving credits scheme: A comparison between Beijing and the Netherlands
Keywords:tradable driving credits, car use, travel demand management, willingness to change, Beijing, the Netherlands
AbstractRecent years have seen a surge of interest in the concept of tradable driving credits (TDC) as an alternative to road pricing and driving restriction measures. However, empirical research into drivers’ responses to a TDC measure is limited and even lacking for the Chinese context where the concept of TDC has attracted considerable attention. This paper reports the results of a survey that was the first to investigate drivers’ willingness to change car use under a hypothetical distance-based TDC measure in China (Beijing) and aimed to compare these results with the results of a comparative Dutch survey. We observed that willingness to change was considerably higher in Beijing than in the Netherlands and that a substantial share of Beijing car owners indicated an increase in car use. In both contexts, higher education and higher car use intensity had a positive effect on the willingness to change, whereas higher income had a negative effect. We found mixed results for household size, respondents’ car attitudes, and TDC scenario characteristics.
Bao, Y., Gao, Z., Xu, M., & Yang, H. (2014). Tradable credit scheme for mobility management considering travelers’ loss aversion. Transportation Research Part E, 68, 138–154. doi: 10.1016/j.tre.2014.05.007
Buitelaar, E., van der Heijden, R., & Argiolu, R. (2007). Managing traffic by privatization of road capacity: A property rights approach. Transport Reviews, 27, 699–713. doi: 10.1080/01441640701262949
Chen, X., & Zhao, J. (2013). Bidding to drive: Car license auction policy in Shanghai and its public acceptance. Transport Policy, 27, 39–52. doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2012.11.016
Dales, J. H. (1968). Pollution, property and prices: An essay in policy-making and economics. Toronto: Toronto University Press.
Dogterom, N., Ettema, D., & Dijst, M. (2018). Behavioral effects of a tradable driving credit scheme: Results of an online stated adaptation experiment in the Netherlands. Transportation Research Part A, 107, 52–64. doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2017.11.004
Dogterom, N., Ettema, D., & Dijst, M. (2017). Tradable credits for managing car travel: A review of empirical research and relevant behavioral approaches. Transport Reviews, 37, 322–343. doi: 10.1080/01441647.2016.1245219
Fan, W., & Jiang, X. (2013). Tradable mobility permits in roadway capacity allocation: Review and appraisal. Transport Policy, 30, 132–142. doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2013.09.002
Gehlert, T., Kramer, C., Nielsen, O. A., & Schlag, B. (2011). Socioeconomic differences in public acceptability and car use adaptation towards urban road pricing. Transport Policy, 18, 685–694. doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2011.01.003
Goddard, H. C. (1997). Using tradeable permits to achieve sustainability in the world’s large cities. Environmental and Resource Economics, 10, 63–99.
Grant-Muller, S., & Xu, M. (2014). The role of tradable credit schemes in road traffic congestion management. Transport Reviews, 34, 128–149. doi: 10.1080/01441647.2014.880754
Hao, H., Wang, H., & Ouyang, M. (2011). Comparison of policies on vehicle ownership and use between Beijing and Shanghai and their impacts on fuel consumption by passenger vehicles. Energy Policy, 39, 1016–1021. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2010.11.039
Kockelman, K. M., & Kalmanje, S. (2005). Credit-based congestion pricing: A policy proposal and the public’s response. Transportation Research Part A, 39, 671–690. doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2005.02.014
Ng, W.-S., Schipper, L., & Chen, Y. (2010). China motorization trends: New directions for crowded cities. Journal of Transport and Land Use, 3, 5–25. doi: 10.5198/jtlu.v3i3.151
Nie, Y. (2017). Why is license plate rationing not a good transport policy? Transportmetrica A: Transport Science, 9935, 1–23. doi: 10.1080/23249935.2016.1202354
Nie, Y. M., & Yin, Y. (2013). Managing rush hour travel choices with tradable credit scheme. Transportation Research Part B, 50, 1–19. doi: 10.1016/j.trb.2013.01.00
Raux, C. (2004). The use of transferable permits in transport policy. Transportation Research Part D, 9, 185–197. doi: 10.1016/j.trd.2004.01.001
Raux, C., Croissant, Y., & Pons, D. (2015). Would personal carbon trading reduce travel emissions more effectively than a carbon tax? Transportation Research Part D, 35, 72–83. doi: 10.1016/j.trd.2014.11.008
Rienstra, S. A., Rietveld, P., & Verhoef, E. T. (1999). The social support for policy measures in passenger transport. A statistical analysis for the Netherlands. Transportation Research Part D, 4, 181–200. doi: 10.1016/S1361-9209(99)00005-X
Steg, L. (2005). Car use: lust and must. Instrumental, symbolic and affective motives for car use. Transportation Research Part A, 39, 147–162. doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2004.07.001
Sun, C., Zheng, S., & Wang, R. (2014). Restricting driving for better traffic and clearer skies: Did it work in Beijing? Transport Policy, 32, 34–41. doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2013.12.010
Tietenberg, T. (2003). The tradable permits approach to protecting the commons: lessons for climate change. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 19, 400–419.
Ubbels, B. (2006). Road pricing. Effectiveness, acceptance and institutional aspects. PhD thesis, Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen en Bedrijfskunde, Free University, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Ubbels, B., & Verhoef, E. (2005). Behavioral responses to road pricing. Empirical results from a survey among Dutch car owners. European Transport, 31, 101–117.
Verhoef, E. T., Nijkamp, P., & Rietveld, P. (1997). Tradeable permits: Their potential in the regulation of road transport externalities. Environment and Planning B, 24, 527–548.
Viegas, J. (2001). Making urban road pricing acceptable and effective: Searching for quality and equity in urban mobility. Transport Policy, 8, 289–294. doi: 10.1016/S0967-070X(01)00024-5.
Wang, G., Gao, Z., Xu., M., & Sun, H. (2014). Models and a relaxation algorithm for continuous network design problem with a tradable credit scheme and equity constraints. Computers and Operations Research, 41, 252–261. doi: 10.1016/j.cor.2012.11.010
Wang, L., Xu, J., & Qin, P. (2014). Will a driving restriction policy reduce car trips? The case study of Beijing, China. Transportation Research Part A, 67, 279–290. doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2014.07.014
Wang, X., Yang, H., Zhu, D., & Li, C. (2012). Tradable travel credits for congestion management with heterogeneous users. Transportation Research Part E, 48, 426–437. doi: 10.1016/j.tre.2011.10.007
Wang, Z., & Liu, W. (2015). Determinants of CO2 emissions from household daily travel in Beijing, China: Individual travel characteristic perspectives. Applied Energy, 158, 292–299. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.08.065
Washbrook, K., Haider, W., & Jaccard, M. (2006). Estimating commuter mode choice: A discrete choice analysis of the impact of road pricing and parking charges. Transportation, 33, 621–639.
Williams, M., & Arkaraprasertkul, N. (2016). Mobility in a global city: Making sense of Shanghai’s growing automobile-dominated transport culture. Urban Studies, 1–16. doi: 10.1177/0042098016637568
Wu, D., Yin, Y., Lawphongpanich, S., & Yang, H. (2012). Design of more equitable congestion pricing and tradable credit schemes for multimodal transportation networks. Transportation Research Part B, 46, 1273–1287. doi: 10.1016/j.trb.2012.05.004
Xiao, F., Qian, Z., & Zhang, H. M. (2013). Managing bottleneck congestion with tradable credits. Transportation Research Part B, 56, 1–14. doi: 10.1016/j.trb.2013.06.016
Xu, M., Grant-Muller, S., Huang, H.-J., & Gao, Z. (2015). Transport management measures in the post-Olympic Games period: Supporting sustainable urban mobility for Beijing? International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology, 22, 1–14. doi: 10.1080/13504509.2014.990542
Xu, M., & Grant-Muller, S. (2016a). Trip mode and travel pattern impacts of a tradable credits scheme: A case study of Beijing. Transport Policy, 47, 72–83. doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2015.12.00
Xu, M., & Grant-Muller, S. (2016b). VMT reduction and potential environmental effects with a tradable credits scheme: A simulation case study of Great Britain. International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology, 23, 1–12. doi: 10.1080/13504509.2016.1165756
Yang, H., & Wang, X. (2011). Managing network mobility with tradable credits. Transportation Research Part B, 45, 580–594. doi: 10.1016/j.trb.2010.10.002
Yang, J., Liu, Y., Qin, P., & Liu, A. A. (2014). A review of Beijing’s vehicle registration lottery: Short-term effects on vehicle growth and fuel consumption. Energy Policy, 75, 157–166. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2014.05.055
Ye, H., & Yang, H. (2013). Continuous price and flow dynamics of tradable mobility credits. Transportation Research Part B, 57, 436–450. doi: 10.1016/j.trb.2013.05.007
Zanni, A. M., Bristow, A. L., & Wardman, M. (2013). The potential behavioral effect of personal carbon trading: Results from an experimental survey. Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy, 2, 222–243.
How to Cite
Authors who publish with JTLU agree to the following terms: 1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial License 4.0 that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. 2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal. 3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.