Reducing greenhouse gas emissions from transportation and land use: Lessons from West Coast states




climate change, greenhouse gases, state departments of transportation, metropolitan planning organizations, transportation planning


Planners and policymakers in the United States increasing-ly recognize climate change as a critical challenge. Because the trans-portation sector accounts for one-third of all greenhouse gas emissions (GHGs) linked to climate change, some states—including California, Oregon, and Washington—have passed legislation to reduce GHGs from transportation. Much of the work to date has focused on model-ing impacts and evaluating performance of different strategies. Instead, this paper focuses on policy adoption and implementation. This re-search relies on document analysis and stakeholder interviews to ex-amine state efforts to reduce GHGs by examining goals, plans, actions, and results. While these states have all established statutory goals to reduce GHGs, planning, implementation, and monitoring vary across states. California and Oregon rely on state- and metropolitan-level planning, while Washington relies on a state approach. California has enacted funding programs to implement strategies to achieve reduc-tions and worked to reduce regulatory barriers to compact develop-ment. All states monitor levels of GHGs, but the impact of plans is often unexamined. Though West Coast states have taken initial steps to enact goals and require scenario plans, states must provide funding or regulatory relief while improving monitoring in order to achieve ambitious goals to reduce GHGs from transportation.

Author Biographies

Rebecca Lewis, University of Oregon

Assistant Professor, Department of Planning, Public Policy and Management

Robert Zako, University of Oregon

Research Associate, Sustainable Cities Initiative

Alexis Biddle, University of Oregon

Graduate Student, Department of Planning, Public Policy and Management and School of Law

Rory Isbell, University of Oregon

Graduate Student, Department of Planning, Public Policy and Management and School of Law


Barbour, E., & Deakin, E. A. (2012). Smart growth planning for climate protection: Evaluating California’s Senate Bill 375. Journal of the American Planning Association, 78(1), 70–86.

California Air Resources Board. (2014). Assembly Bill 32 scoping plan. Retrieved from

Cambridge Systematics & Urban Land Institute. (2009). Moving cooler: An analysis of transportation strategies for reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Washington, DC: Urban Land Institute.

Campoli, G. (2012). Facing up to climate change: Planning and implementation at the Vermont Agency of Transportation. TR News, 281(July–August), 13–14.

Crane, R. (2000). The influence of urban form on travel: An interpretative review. Journal of Planning Literature, 15(1), 3–23.

Crozet, P., & Lopez-Ruiz, H. G. (2013). Macromotives and microbehaviors: Climate change constraints and passenger mobility scenarios for France. Transport Policy, 29(Supplement C), 294–302. doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2012.07.002

Drummond, W. J. (2010). Statehouse versus greenhouse. Journal of the American Planning Association, 76(4), 413–433. doi:10.1080/01944363.2010.499537

Ewing, R., Bartholomew, K., Winkelman, S., Walters, J., & Chen, D. (2007). Growing cooler: The evidence on urban development and climate change. Washington, DC: Urban Land Institute.

Ewing, R., & Cervero, R. (2003). Travel and the built environment: A synthesis. Transportation Research Record, 1780, 87–114.

Ford, A., Blythe, P., Dawson, R., & Barr, S. (2018). Land-use transport models for climate change mitigation and adaptation planning. Journal of Transport and Land Use, 11(1), 83–101.

Fulton, W. (2015). Will climate change save growth management in California? In G. Knaap, Z. Nedovic-Budic, & A. Carbonell (Eds.), Planning for states and nation-states in the U.S. and Europe. Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.

Gallivan, F., Ang-Olson, J., & Turchetta, D. (2011). Toward a better state climate action plan: Review and assessment of proposed transportation strategies. Transportation Research Record, 2244, 1–8.

Hammadou, H., & Papaix, C. (2014). Which policy tools to move towards low carbon mobility? In Applied sciences and technology: Non-technological innovations for sustainable transport. New York, NY: SpringerBriefs, Springer Publishing.

Hickman, R., Ashiru, O., & Banister, D. (2010). Transport and climate change: Simulating the options for carbon reduction in London. Transport Policy, 17(2), 110–125. doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2009.12.002

ICF International. (2011). Synthesis of climate change and transportation research efforts at state DOTs, state universities, and federal level. Retrieved from 15 11.pdf

Johnson, G. C., Annelin, N., & Schuster, K. (2012). Climate change adaptation in Michigan: Preparations, strategies, and examples. R News, 281(July–August), 5–9.

Michele, L. (n.d.). Target and goal setting. Retrieved from

Metro. (2014). Climate Smart Strategy for the Portland metropolitan region. Retrieved from

Morrow, R. W., Gallagher, K. S., Collantes, G., & Lee, H. (2010). Analysis of policies to reduce oil consumption and greenhouse-gas emissions from the U.S. transportation sector. Energy Policy, 38(3), 1305–1320. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2009.11.006

Nakamura, K., & Hayashi, Y. (2013). Strategies and instruments for low-carbon urban transport: An international review on trends and effects. Transport Policy, 29(Supplement C), 264–274. doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2012.07.003

National Research Council. (2009). Driving and the built environment: The effects of compact development on motorized travel, energy use, and CO2 emissions. Transportation Research Board special report, No. 298. Washington, D.C: Transportation Research Board of the National Academies.

Noland, R. B., & Burbank, C. (2012). Implementing climate change policies: State and local innovations to mitigate and adapt to climate change. TR News, 281(July–August), 3–4.

Oregon Departments of Environmental Quality, Energy, and Transportation. (2013). Oregon’s greenhouse gas emissions through 2010: In-boundary, consumption-based and expanded transportation sector inventories. Retrieved from

Oregon Department of Transportation. (2013). Oregon statewide transportation strategy: A 2050 vision for greenhouse gas emissions reduction. Retrieved from

Oregon Global Warming Commission. (2010). Interim roadmap to 2020. Retrieved from

Oregon Global Warming Commission. (2017). Biennial report to the legislature. Retrieved from

Pollak, M., Meyer, B., & Wilson, E. (2011). Reducing greenhouse gas emissions: Lessons from state climate action plans. Energy Policy, 39, 5429–5439.

Puget Sound Regional Council. (2010). Transportation 2040: Toward a sustainable transportation system. Retrieved from

Rodier, C. (2009). Review of international modeling literature. Transportation Research Record, 2132, 1–12. doi:10.3141/2132-01

Su, Q. (2017). Travel demand management policy instruments, urban spatial characteristics, and household greenhouse gas emissions from travel in the U.S. urban areas. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 7(3), 157–166. Retrieved from

Turner, C. R., Frazier, J. A., & Kaiser, R. G. (2009). How will state transportation agencies handle the issue of climate change: A case study from the state of Maryland. In Proceedings of the Transportation Land Use, Planning, and Air Quality Conference, held in Denver, Colorado, July 28–29, 2009 (pp. 86–94). Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers.

U.S. Department of State. (2014). United States climate action report 2014, Chap. 5: Projected greenhouse gas emissions. Retrieved from

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (2015-April). Inventory of U.S. greenhouse gas emissions and sinks: 1990–2013. Publication EPA 430-R-14-004. Washington DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Retrieved from

U.S. Federal Highway Administration. (2015). U.S. driving nears 1 trillion miles in first four months of 2015. Retrieved from

Washington State Dept. of Ecology, & Washington State Community, Trade and Economic Development Dept. (2008). Growing Washington’s economy in a carbon-constrained world: A comprehensive plan to address the challenges and opportunities of climate change. Publication no. 08-01-025. Retrieved from

Washington State Court of Appeals. (2013). Cascade Bicycle Club v. Puget Sound Regional Council. Retrieved from

Washington State Department of Ecology. (2014). Washington state greenhouse gas emissions inventory 2010–2011. Retrieved from

Washington State Transportation Commission. (2015). Washington transportation plan 2035: Policy plan. Retrieved from

West Coast Governors’ Global Warming Initiative. (2004). Staff recommendations to the governors. Retrieved from

Western Climate Initiative. (2008). Design recommendations for the WCI regional cap-and-trade program. Retrieved from

Wheeler, S. M. (2008). State and municipal climate change plans: The first generation. Journal of the American Planning Association, 74(4), 481–496.

Zhang, L., Hong, J., Nasri, A., & Shen, Q. (2012). How built environment affects travel behavior: A comparative analysis of the connections between land use and vehicle miles traveled in U.S. cities. Journal of Transport and Land Use, 5(3), 40–52.




How to Cite

Lewis, R., Zako, R., Biddle, A., & Isbell, R. (2018). Reducing greenhouse gas emissions from transportation and land use: Lessons from West Coast states. Journal of Transport and Land Use, 11(1).