Are millennials moving to more urbanized and transit-oriented counties?
Keywords:Millennial, Migration, Push-Pull model, Spatial characteristics, Travel modes
AbstractRecent studies show that two distinct narratives have emerged about the millennials’ behavior, attitudes, and preferences regarding their choice of residence and transportation. According to the optimistic narrative, by living and traveling sustainably, millennials are planting the seeds of an urban renaissance. According to the pessimistic narrative, the changes in their behavior are due to economic constraints. To examine whether the inter-county migration pattern of American millennials is consistent with the optimistic narrative, this study compares some spatial and travel characteristics of the origins and destinations of millennials (age 25-34) and older adults (age 35-64) by using data from the 2011-2015 American Community Survey and the 2010 Longitudinal Employer-Household Dynamics. Basic comparisons show that the destinations chosen by millennials are likely to have the characteristics that are consistent with the optimistic narrative. The push-pull regression models show that the effects of the county characteristics on migration are often significant but modest. The effects are not remarkably different for the two age groups.
Benetsky, M. J., & Fields, A. (2015). Millennial migration: How has the Great Recession affected the migration of a cohort as it came of age? SEHSD working paper No. 2015-1. U.S. Washington, DC: US Census Bureau.
Blumenberg, E., Ralph, K., Smart, M., & Taylor, B. D. (2016). Who knows about kids these days? Analyzing the determinants of youth and adult mobility in the US between 1990 and 2009. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 93, 39–54.
Brown, D. G., Johnson, K. M., Loveland, T. R., & Theobald, D. M. (2005). Rural land‐use trends in the conterminous United States, 1950–2000. Ecological Applications, 15(6), 1851–1863.
Center for Transit Oriented Development. (2004). Hidden in plain sight: Capturing the demand for housing near stations. Oakland, CA: Reconnecting America. Retrieved from http://www.reconnectingamerica.org/assets/Uploads/2004Ctodreport.pdf
Cervero, R. (1989). Jobs-housing balancing and regional mobility. Journal of the American Planning Association, 55(2), 136–150.
Chen, Y., & Rosenthal, S. S. (2008). Local amenities and life-cycle migration: Do people move for jobs or fun? Journal of Urban Economics, 64(3), 519–537.
Cooke, T. (2018). United States: Cohort effects on long-term decline in migration rates. In T. Champion, T. Cooke, & I. Shuttleworth (Eds.), Internal migration in developed world (pp. 101–119). New York: Routledge.
Davis, M., Fisher, J., & Veracierto, M. (2010). The role of housing in labor reallocation. Working Paper 2010-18. Chicago: Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago.
Delbosc, A., & Ralph, K. (2017). A tale of two millennials. Journal of Transport and Land Use, 10(1), 57–64.
Dickerson, A. M. (2016). Millennials, affordable housing, and the future of homeownership. Journal of Affordable Housing, 24(3), 435–465.
Dutzik, T., Inglis, J., & Baxandall, P. (2014). Millennials in motion: Changing travel habits of young Americans and the implications for public policy. Washington, DC: U.S. PIRG Education Fund. Retrieved from http://www.uspirg.org/reports/usp/millennials-motion.
Gallagher, L. (2013). The end of the suburbs. New York: Portfolio/Penguin.
Greenwood, M. J. (1997). Internal migration in developed countries. In M. R. Rosenzweig & O. Stark (Eds.), Handbook of population and family economics Vol. 1B (pp. 647–720). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Guest, A. M., & Cluett, C. (1976). Workplace and residential location: A push‐pull model. Journal of Regional Science, 16(3), 399–410.
Jennissen, R. (2007). Causality chains in the international migration systems approach. Population Research and Policy Review, 26(4), 411–436.
Jurjevich, J. R., Schrock, G., & Kang, J. (2017). Destination Portland: Post-Great Recession migration trends in the Rose City region. Publications, Reports and Presentations 39. Portland, OR: Portland State University. Retrieved from http://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/prc_pub/39
Kaplan, G., & Schulhofer-Wohl, S. (2015). Understanding the long-run decline in interstate migration. Working paper 697. Minneapolis: Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis.
Kelly, H. F., Billingsley, A. C., Warren, A., & Kramer, A. (2017). Emerging trends in real estate: United States and Canada 2017. Washington, DC: Urban Land Institute.
Kennedy, P. (2001). A guide to econometrics. 4th ed. Cambridge, MA: MIT press.
King, R. (2012). Theories and typologies of migration: An overview and a primer. Willy Brandt Series of Working Papers in International Migration and Ethnic Relations. Malmö Sweden: Malmö Institute for Studies of Migration, Diversity and Welfare (MIM), Malmö University.
Klein, N. J., & Smart, M. J. (2017). Millennials and car ownership: Less money, fewer cars. Transport Policy, 53, 20–29.
Korpi, M., & Clark, W. A. (2015). Internal migration and human capital theory: To what extent is it selective? Economics Letters, 136, 31–34.
Kotkin, J., & Cox, W. (2013). The future of the affluent American city. Cityscape: A Journal of Policy Development and Research, 15(3), 203–207.
Lee, E. S. (1966). A theory of migration. Demography, 3(1), 47–57.
Mallach, A. (2018). What does march of the millennials mean for the future of American city? In M. Moos, D. Pfeiffer, & T. Vinodrai (Eds.), The millennial city: Trends, implications, and prospects for urban planning and policy (pp. 267–285). London: Routledge.
Molloy, R., Smith, C. L., & Wozniak, A. (2011). Internal migration in the United States. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 25(3), 173–196.
Moos, M., Pfeiffer, D., & Vinodrai, T. (2018). The millennial city, shaped by contradictions. In M. Moos, D. Pfeiffer, & T. Vinodrai (Eds.), The millennial city: Trends, implications, and prospects for urban planning and policy (pp. 3–11). London: Routledge.
Myers, D. (2016). Peak millennials: Three reinforcing cycles that amplify the rise and fall of urban concentration by millennials. Housing Policy Debate, 26(6), 928–947.
National Bureau of Economic Research. (2017). County distance database, 2010. Retrieved from http://www.nber.org/data/county-distance-database.html
Pfeiffer, D., & Pearthree, G. (2018). The real estate industry cementing millennials’ residence in urban cores and central cities? Insights from Phoenix and Houston. In M. Moos, D. Pfeiffer, and T. Vinodrai (Eds.), The millennial city: Trends, implications, and prospects for urban planning and policy (pp. 125–141). London: Routledge.
Piiparinen, R., Russell, J., & Post, C. (2016). The fifth migration: A study of Cleveland millennials, Urban Publications, 1338. Cleveland, OH: Maxine Goodman Levin College of Urban Affairs, Cleveland State University. Retrieved from http://engagedscholarship.csuohio.edu/urban_facpub/1338
Polzin, S. E., & Chu, X. (2014). Peak vehicle miles traveled and post-peak consequences? Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2453, 22–29.
Ravenstein, E. G. (1885). The laws of migration – I. Journal of the Statistical Society, 48(2), 167–227.
RSG, Inc., Coogan, M., RAND Corporation, Nelson Nygaard, & Weinberger, R. (2017). Understanding changes in youth mobility. Washington, DC: The American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO), Standing Committee on Planning. Retrieved from http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/nchrp/docs/NCHRP08-36(132)_FR.pdf
Schoorl, J., Heering, L., Esveldt, I., Groenewold, G., & Van der Erf, R. (2000). Push and pull factors of international migration: A comparative report. Luxembourg: European Commission.
Sivak, M., & Schoettle, B. (2012). Recent changes in the age composition of drivers in 15 countries. Traffic Injury Prevention, 13(2), 126–132.
Studenmund, A. H. (2001). Using econometrics: A practical guide. 4th ed. Boston: Addison Wesley Longman.
Talen, E. (2017). Empower the millennials. Housing Policy Debate, 27(2), 331–333.
TransitCenter. (2014). Who is on board? 2014 mobility attitudes survey. Retrieved from http://transitcenter.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/WhosOnBoard2014-ForWeb.pdf
US Census Bureau. (2017a). County-to-county migration flows: 2011-2015 ACS. Retrieved from https://www.census.gov/topics/population/migration/guidance/county-to-county-migration-flows.html
US Census Bureau. (2017b). U.S. Gazetteer Files, 2015. Retrieved from https://www.census.gov/geo/maps-data/data/gazetteer2015.html
US Census Bureau. (2017c). American FactFinder. Retrieved from https://factfinder.census.gov/faces/nav/jsf/pages/index.xhtml
US Census Bureau. (2017d). Longitudinal Employer-Household Dynamics (LEHD). Retrieved from https://lehd.ces.census.gov/
US Department of Agriculture. (2017). Rural America at a glance: 2017 Edition. Washington, DC: US Department of Agriculture.
Zimmermann, K. F. (1996). European migration: Push and pull. International Regional Science Review, 19(1–2), 95–128.
How to Cite
Authors who publish with JTLU agree to the following terms: 1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial License 4.0 that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. 2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal. 3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.