Is private-schooling problematic for transportation? Evidence from Southeast Queensland, Australia


  • Yiping Yan Griffith University
  • Matthew Burke Griffith University
  • Abraham Leung Griffith University
  • James McBroom Griffith University



Journeys-to-school; private school; public school; urban form; travel behavior difference


School travel behaviors are associated with children’s health and well-being, traffic congestion, and sustainability. Australia has seen a steady rise in the number of car-passenger trips made by children to school, and a decline in walking-to-school. Australia differs from most nations in that it has one of the highest rates of private schooling in the world at around 34%, supported by high levels of Commonwealth Government funding. Little is known about the effects this has on travel behavior and whether it is a factor in Australia’s high rates of chauffeuring. This paper looks at journeys-toschool in South-East Queensland. Two research questions were posed: i) how do students in private and public schools travel to school, including mode shares and median trip-distances by mode?; and ii) is there any relationship between school type and mode choice, when controlling for key demographic and land use variables? Advanced geo-spatial matching allocated all trips made to schools in the 2017-2019 South East Queensland Travel Survey to either public or private schools. The resulting dataset included 2600 public school students’ trips to school and 1117 private school students’ trips to school. The public and private schools’ commuting travel behavior was then examined. Private motor vehicle is the most frequently chosen mode for travelling to school across the two groups (72.3% for public and 74.6% for private). The proportion of students walking/biking to school is 2.3 times greater for public than for private schools (16.8% versus 7.3%) even though those two groups share the same median trip distance value in active travel. For all other travel modes (automobile, public transportation and school bus), median trip distances are greater for private school students than private school students. Multinomial logistic regression modelling suggests that private school students are less likely to walk/cycle to school than public school students when controlling for key demographics and schools’ urban form characteristics. Private schools appear to disproportionately contribute to traffic congestion. Australia should consider amending its school policy frameworks to help address these concerns.


Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2016). Regional Population.

Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2018). Schools. Retrieved from

Barcan, A. (2010). Public schools in Australia from the late 1970s to the late 1980s: The seeds of change. Education Research and Perspectives, 37(2), 1–37.

Benveniste, L., Carnoy, M., & Rothstein, R. (2003). All else equal: Are public and private schools different? New York: Routledge.

Braun, H., Jenkins, F., & Grigg, W. (2006). Comparing private schools and public schools using hierarchical linear modeling (NCES 2006-461). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences.

Burke, G., & Spaull, A. (2002). Australian schools: Participation and funding, 1901-2000, Australia now 1301.0 — 2002 yearbook Australia. Canberra: Australian Bureau of Statistics.

Burke, M., & Brown, A. L. (2007). Distances people walk for transport. Road & Transport Research, 16(3), 16–28.

Buttazzoni, A. N., Van Kesteren, E. S., Shah, T. I., & Gilliland, J.A. (2018). Active school travel intervention methodologies in North America: A systematic review. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 55(1): 115–124.

Chillón, P., Evenson, K. R., Vaughn, A., & Ward, D. S. (2011). A systematic review of interventions for promoting active transportation to school. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 8.

Deka, D. (2013). An explanation of the relationship between adults’ work trip mode and children’s school trip mode through the Heckman approach. Journal of Transport Geography, 31, 54–63.

Daniels, R., Mulley, C. (2013). Explaining walking distance to public transport: The dominance of public transport supply. Journal of Transport and Land Use, 6(2), 5–20.

Department of Education of the Queensland Government. (2019). Queensland state schools.

Department of Transport and Main Roads of the Queensland Government. (2018). Queensland roads and tracks.

Department of Transport and Main Roads of the Queensland Government. (2019). South East Queensland travel survey 2009.

Easton, S., & Ferrari, E. (2015). Children’s travel to school—the interaction of individual, neighborhood and school factors. Transport Policy, 44, 9–18.

Ermagun, A., Hossein Rashidi, T., & Samimi, A. (2015). A joint model for mode choice and escort decision of school trips. Transportation Science, 11, 270–289.

Figlio, D. N., & Stone, J. A. (1997). Are private schools really better? (Discussion paper 1141-97). Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Institute for Research on Poverty.

Giles-Corti, B., Wood, G., Pikora, T., Learnihan, V., Bulsara, M., Van Niel, K., … & Villanueva, K. (2011). School site and the potential to walk to school: The impact of street connectivity and traffic exposure in school neighborhoods. Health & Place 17(2), 545–550.

Gleason, P. M. (2019). Charter schools’ systemic effects. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 38(4), 1071–1074.

Green, F., & Kynaston, D. (2019). Engines of privilege: Britain’s private school problem. London: Bloomsbury.

Guliani, A. (2015). Gender-based differences in school travel mode choice behavior: Examining the relationship between the neighborhood environment and perceived traffic safety. Journal of Transport & Health, 2, 502–511.

Guliani, A., Mitra, R., Buliung, R. N., Larsen, K., & Faulkner., G. E. J. (2015). Gender-based differences in school travel mode choice behaviour: Examining the relationship between the neighbourhood environment and perceived traffic safety. Journal of Transport & Health (2), 502–511.

Hägerstrand, T. (1985). Time-geography: Focus on the corporeality of man, society, and environment. In Tokyo, A. S. (Ed.), The Science and Praxis of Complexity: Contributions to the Symposium Held at Montpellier, France, 9–11 May 1984 (pp. 193–216). United Nations University.

Heyneman, S., & Stern, J. (2014). Low-cost private schools for the poor: What public policy Is appropriate? International Journal of Educational Development, 35, 3–15.

Imberman, S. A. (2011). The effect of charter schools on achievement and behavior of public-school students. Journal of Public Economics, 95(7–8), 850–863.

Jarvis, H. (2003). Dispelling the myth that preference makes practice in residential location and transport behavior. Housing Studies, 18, 587–606.

Kennedy, M. (2009). Talking your way to the top: A sociological examination of the role of elite education in the reproduction of privilege in Irish society. Limerick: Ireland: Department of Sociology, University of Limerick.

Kennedy, M., & Power, M.J. (2010). The smokescreen of meritocracy: White education in Ireland and the reproduction of class privilege. Journal for Critical Education Policy Studies, 8(2), 223–248.

Khan, S. R. (2011). Privilege: The making of an adolescent elite at St. Paul’s School. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Love, P. G. (2015). Children’s independent mobility and social capital in Catholic schools (Doctoral thesis), University of Melbourne, Australia.

Lubienski, C. & Lubienski, S. T. (2013). The public school advantage: Why public schools outperform private schools. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Leung, A., Burke, M., Cui, J., & Perl, A. (2015). New approaches to oil vulnerability mapping for Australian cities: The case of Southeast Queensland, the 200km city. Paper presented at the State of Australian Cities National Conference, December 9–11, 2015, Gold Coast, Australia. Retrieved from

Leung, A., Burke, M., & Cui, J. (2018). The tale of two (very different) cities—Mapping the urban transport oil vulnerability of Brisbane and Hong Kong. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 65, 796–816.

Mackett, R. L. (2013). Children’s travel behavior and its health implications. Transport Policy, 26, 66–72.

Macpherson, I., Robertson, S., & Walford, G. (2014). Education, privatization and social justice: Case studies from Africa, South Asia and Southeast Asia. Oxford, England: Symposium books.

Mandic, S., Sandretto, S., García Bengoechea, E., Hopkins, D., Moore, A., Rodda, J., & Wilson, G. (2017). Enrolling in the closest school or not? Implications of school choice decisions for active transport to school. Journal of Transport & Health, 6, 347–357.

McMillan, T., Day, K., Boarnet, M. G., & Alfonzo, M. (2006). Johnny walks to school—Does Jane? Sex differences in children’s active travel to school. Children, Youth and Environments, 16, 75–89.

Mehdizadeh, M., Mamdoohi, A., & Nordfjaern, T. (2017). Walking time to school, children’s active school travel and their related factors. Journal of Transport & Health, 6, 313–326.

Metz, D. (2008). The limits to travel: How far will you go? London: Earthscan.

Mitra, R., & Buliung, R .N. (2015). Exploring differences in school travel mode choice behaviour between children and youth. Transport Policy 42, 4–11.

Moghtaderi, F., Burke, D. M., & Dodson, D. J. (2012). A systematic review of children’s travel behavior change programs in Australia. Paper presented at the 35th Australian Transport Research Forum (ATRF), Perth, Australia. Retrieved from last

Moran, M. R., Rodríguez, D. A., & Corburn, J. (2018). Examining the role of trip destination and neighborhood attributes in shaping environmental influences on children’s route choice. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 65, 63–81.

Müller, S., Tscharaktschiew, S., & Haase, K. (2008). Travel-to-school mode choice modelling and patterns of school choice in urban areas. Journal of Transport Geography, 16, 342–357.

Panter, J. R., Jones, A. P., Van Sluijs, E. M. F., & Griffin, S. J. (2010). Neighborhood, route, and school environments and children’s active commuting. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 38, 268-278.

Pitot, M., Yigitcanlar, T., Sipe, N., & Evans, R. (2006). Land use & public transport accessibility index (LUPTAI) tool: The development and pilot application of LUPTAI for the Gold Coast. Crawley, Australia: Planning and Transport Research Centre (PATREC).

Queensland Government (2019). General transit feed specification (GTFS)-South East Queensland.

Rhoulac, T. D. (2005). Bus or car? The classic choice in school transportation. Transportation Research Record, 1922, 98–104.

Ridgewell, C., Sipe, N., & Buchanan, N. (2009). School travel modes: Factors influencing parental choice in four Brisbane schools. Urban Policy Research, 27, 43–57.

Schlossberg, M., Greene, J., Phillips, P. P., Johnson, B., & Parker, B. (2006). School trips: Effects of urban form and distance on travel mode. Journal of the American Planning Association, 72, 337–346.

State of Queensland. (2012). Travel in southeast Queensland. Queensland: Department of Transport and Main Roads.

Sidharthan, R., Bhat, C. R., Pendyala, R. M., & Goulias, K.G. (2011). Model for children’s school travel mode choice: Accounting for effects of spatial and social interaction. Transportation Research Record, 2213(1), 78–86.

Spinney, J. E. L., & Millward, H. (2011). School travel mode choice and characteristics of the children, school and neighborhood. Children, Youth and Environments, 212, 57–76.

Treewanchai, S. (2014). Essays on economics of school and residential choices (Doctoral thesis), University of Adelaide, Australia.

Van der Ploeg, H. P., Merom, D., Corpuz, G., & Bauman, A.E. (2008). Trends in Australian children traveling to school 1971–2003: Burning petrol or carbohydrates? Preventive Medicine, 46, 60–62.

Walker, J. (2012). Human transit: How clearer thinking about public transit can enrich our communities and our lives. Washington, DC: Island Press.

Wilson, E. J., Marshall, J., Wilson, R., & Krizek, K. J. (2010). By foot, bus or car: Children’s school travel and school choice policy. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 42, 2168–2185.

Wilson, E. J., Wilson, R., & Krizek, K. J. (2007). The implications of school choice on travel behavior and environmental emissions. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 12(7), 506–518.

Wong, B. Y. M., Faulkner, G., & Buliung, R. (2011). GIS measured environmental correlates of active school transport: A systematic review of 14 studies. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 8.




How to Cite

Yan, Y., Burke, M., Leung, A., & McBroom, J. (2022). Is private-schooling problematic for transportation? Evidence from Southeast Queensland, Australia. Journal of Transport and Land Use, 15(1), 567–585.