Factors influencing subjective walkability: Results from built environment audit data
Keywords:Walkability, Subjective Walkability, Audit, Built Environment
Subjective walkability is a measure of the perceived friendliness of walking in an area. Though subjective walkability is less commonly assessed than objective measurements, the latter often fail to reflect the experience of walking. This study aims to better understand subjective walkability and how it varies between travel and leisure walking by investigating its relationship with the built environment and land-use characteristics. Data is collected from 848 street segments in Montreal, Canada, using the MAPS-mini audit tool, external measurements including Walkscore as well as synthetic subjective walkability scores. Mixed effect multilevel models are then generated using travel and leisure subjective walkability scores as dependent variables and built environment features as independent variables. Statistically significant positive predictors of perceived walkability differ between walking for travel and walking for leisure. Walkscore is found to have a weak but significant effect on perceived walkability for travel but no effect at all for leisure. Based on this research, a multi-scalar approach both at the street and neighborhood level making use of a combination of objective and subjective walkability measures should be employed to study predictors of walking behavior. Lastly, distinctions of walking behaviors based on trip purpose should be integrated in future research.
Adkins, A., Barillas-Longoria, G., Martinez, D. N., & Ingram, M. (2019). Differences in social and physical dimensions of perceived walkability in Mexican American and non-hispanic white walking environments in Tucson, Arizona. Journal of Transport & Health, 14, 100585. https://doi.10.1016/j.jth.2019.100585
Akinwande, M., Dikko, H., & Samson, A. (2015). Variance inflation factor: As a condition for the inclusion of suppressor variable(s) in regression analysis. Open Journal of Statistics, 5(7), 754.
Alidoust, S., Bosman, C., & Holden, G. (2018). Talking while walking: An investigation of perceived neighborhood walkability and its implications for the social life of older people. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 33(1), 133–150. https://doi.10.1007/s10901-017-9558-1
Andrews, G., Hall, E., Evans, B., & Colls, R. (2012). Moving beyond walkability: On the potential of health geography. Social Science & Medicine, 75(11), 1925–1932.
Arellana, J., Saltarín, M., Larrañaga, A., Alvarez, V., & Henao, C. (2020). Urban walkability considering pedestrians’ perceptions of the built environment: A 10-year review and a case study in a medium-sized city in Latin America. Transport Reviews, 40(2), 183–203. https://doi.10.1080/01441647.2019.1703842
Arvidsson, D., Kawakami, N., Ohlsson, H., & Sundquist, K. (2012). Physical activity and concordance between objective and perceived walkability. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 44(2), 280–287. https://doi.10.1249/MSS.0b013e31822a9289
Battista, G., & Manaugh, K. (2017). Using embodied videos of walking interviews in walkability assessment. Transportation Research Record, 2661(1), 12–18.
Battista, G., & Manaugh, K. (2018). Stores and mores: Toward socializing walkability. Journal of Transport Geography, 67, 53–60.
Berry, N., Coffee, N., Nolan, R., Dollman, J., & Sugiyama, T. (2017). Neighborhood environmental attributes associated with walking in south Australian adults: Differences between urban and rural areas. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 14(9), 965. https://doi.10.3390/ijerph14090965
Blecic, I., Canu, D., Cecchini, A., Congiu, T., & Fancello, G. (2016). Factors of perceived walkability: A pilot empirical study. Computational Science and its Applications — Iccsa, 9789,125-137.
Blecic, I., Cecchini, A., & Trunfio, G. (2018). Towards automatic assessment of perceived walkability. Paper presented at the 18th International Conference on Computational Science and Its Applications (ICCSA), Monash Univ, Caulfield Campus, Melbourne, Australia, July 2-5.
Blecic, I., Santos, A., Moura, A., & Trunfio, G. (2019). Multi-criteria evaluation vs perceived urban quality: An exploratory comparison. Paper presented at the 19th International Conference on Computational Science and its Applications (ICCSA), Saint Petersburg, Russia, July 1–4.
Boarnet, M., Forsyth, A., Day, K., & Oakes, J. (2011). The street level built environment and physical activity and walking: Results of a predictive validity study for the Irvine Minnesota inventory. Environment and Behavior, 43(6), 735–775. https://doi.10.1177/0013916510379760
Bodeker, M. (2018). Walking and walkability in pre-set and self-defined neighborhoods: A mental mapping study in older adults. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15(7), 1363. https://doi.10.3390/ijerph15071363
Bohte, W., Maat, K., & van Wee, B. (2009). Measuring attitudes in research on residential self‐selection and travel behavior: A review of theories and empirical research. Transport Reviews, 29(3), 325–357.
Brown, B., & Jensen, W. (2020). Dog ownership and walking: Perceived and audited walkability and activity correlates. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(4), 1385. https://doi.10.3390/ijerph17041385
Cain, K., Millstein, R., Sallis, J., Conway, T., Gavand, K., Frank, L., . . . King, A. (2015). Microscale audit of pedestrian streetscapes (MAPS). Retrieved from https://activelivingresearch.org/microscale-audit-pedestrian-streetscapes
Carr, L., Dunsiger, S., & Marcus, B. (2010). Walk score™ as a global estimate of neighborhood walkability. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 39(5), 460-463.
Cerin, E., Leslie, E., & Owen, N. (2009). Explaining socio-economic status differences in walking for transport: An ecological analysis of individual, social and environmental factors. Social Science & Medicine, 68(6), 1013–1020.
Cervero, R., & Kockelman, K. (1997). Travel demand and the 3Ds: Density, diversity, and design. Transportation Research Part D: Transport Environment, 2(3), 199–219.
Consoli, A., Nettel-Aguirre, A., Spence, J. C., McHugh, T. L., Mummery, K., & McCormack, G. R. (2020). Associations between objectively measured and self-reported neighborhood walkability on adherence and steps during an internet-delivered pedometer intervention. PLoS ONE, 15(12), e0242999. https://doi.10.1371/journal.pone.0242999
Daley, J., Rodrigue, L., Ravensbergen, L., DeWeese, J., Butler, G., Kestens, Y., & El-Geneidy, A. (2022). Foot-based microscale audit of light rail network in Montreal Canada. Journal of Transport & Health, 24, 101317.
Davoudian, N., & Mansouri, A. (2016). Does street lighting affect pedestrian behavior at night? Proceedings of Cie 2016 Lighting Quality and Energy Efficiency, 588–595.
Day, K., Boarnet, M., Alfonzo, M., & Forsyth, A. (2006). The Irvine–Minnesota Inventory to measure built environments: Development. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 30(2), 144–152. https://doi.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2005.09.017
Ewing, R., & Cervero, R. (2001). Travel and the built environment: A synthesis. Transportation Research Record, 1780(1), 87–114.
Ewing, R., & Cervero, R. (2010). Travel and the built environment: A meta-analysis. Journal of the American Planning Association, 76(3), 265–294.
Ewing, R., Greenwald, M., Zhang, M., Walters, J., Feldman, M., Cervero, R., & Thomas, J. (2009). Measuring the impact of urban form and transit access on mixed use site trip generation rates—Portland pilot study. Washington, DC: US Environmental Protection Agency.
Fancello, G., Congiu, T., & Tsoukias, A. (2020). Mapping walkability. A subjective value theory approach. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 72, 100923. https://doi.10.1016/j.seps.2020.100923
Fonseca, F., Ribeiro, P., Conticelli, E., Jabbari, M., Papageorgiou, G., Tondelli, S., & Ramos, R. (2021). Built environment attributes and their influence on walkability. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 20, 660–679. https://doi.10.1080/15568318.2021.1914793
Frank, L., Sallis, J., Saelens, B., Leary, L., Cain, K., Conway, T., & Hess, P. (2010). The development of a walkability index: Application to the neighborhood quality of life study. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 44(13), 924–933.
Gebel, K., Bauman, A., & Owen, N. (2009). Correlates of non-concordance between perceived and objective measures of walkability. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 37(2), 228–238. https://doi.10.1007/s12160-009-9098-3
Hajna, S., Dasgupta, K., Halparin, M., & Ross, N. (2013). Neighborhood walkability field validation of Geographic Information System measures. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 44(6), E55–E59. https://doi.10.1016/j.amepre.2013.01.033
Hajna, S., Ross, N., Brazeau, A., Belisle, P., Joseph, L., & Dasgupta, K. (2015). Associations between neighborhood walkability and daily steps in adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Public Health, 15. https://doi.10.1186/s12889-015-2082-x
Hanák, T., Marović, I., & Aigel, P. (2015). Perception of residential environment in cities: A comparative study. Procedia Engineering, 117, 495–501. https://doi.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2015.08.202
Hanibuchi, T., Nakaya, T., Yonejima, M., & Honjo, K. (2015). Perceived and objective measures of neighborhood walkability and physical activity among adults in Japan: A multilevel analysis of a nationally representative sample. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 12(10), 13350–13364. htttps://doi:10.3390/ijerph121013350
Herbolsheimer, F., Mahmood, A., Ungar, N., Michael, Y., Oswald, F., & Chaudhury, H. (2020). Perceptions of the neighborhood built environment for walking behavior in older adults living in close proximity. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 40(2), 0733464820979258.
Herrmann-Lunecke, M., Mora, R., & Vejares, P. (2021). Perception of the built environment and walking in pericentral neighborhoods in Santiago, Chile. Travel Behavior and Society, 23, 192–206.
Herrmann, T., Boisjoly, G., Ross, N., & El-Geneidy, A. (2017). The missing middle filling the gap between walkability and observed walking behavior. Transportation Research Record, 2661, 103–110. https://doi.10.3141/2661-12
Hsieh, H., & Chuang, M. (2021). Association of perceived environment walkability with purposive and discursive walking for urban design strategies. Journal of Transport and Land Use, 14(1), 1099–1127.
Inoue, S., Ohya, Y., Odagiri, Y., Takamiya, T., Ishii, K., Kitabayashi, M., . . . Shimomitsu, T. (2010). Association between perceived neighborhood environment and walking among adults in 4 cities in Japan. Journal of Epidemiology, 20(4), 277–286.
Inoue, S., Ohya, Y., Odagiri, Y., Takamiya, T., Kamada, M., Okada, S., . . . Sallis, J. (2011). Perceived neighborhood environment and walking for specific purposes among elderly Japanese. Journal of Epidemiology, 1110120263.
Jensen, W., Brown, B., Smith, K., Brewer, S., Amburgey, J., & McIff, B. (2017). Active transportation on a complete street: Perceived and audited walkability correlates. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 14(9),1014. https://doi.10.3390/ijerph14091014
Jun, H., & Hur, M. (2015). The relationship between walkability and neighborhood social environment: The importance of physical and perceived walkability. Applied Geography, 62, 115–124. https://doi.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2015.04.014
Koohsari, M., McCormack, G., Shibata, A., Ishii, K., Yasunaga, A., Nakaya, T., & Oka, K. (2021). The relationship between walk score (R) and perceived walkability in ultrahigh density areas. Preventive Medicine Reports, 23,101393. https://doi.10.1016/j.pmedr.2021.101393
Lee, I., & Buchner, D. (2008). The importance of walking to public health. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 40(7), S512.
Manaugh, K., & El-Geneidy, A. (2011). Validating walkability indices: How do different households respond to the walkability of their neighborhood? Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 16(4), 309–315. https://doi.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2011.01.009
Manaugh, K., & El-Geneidy, A. (2013). Does distance matter? Exploring the links among values, motivations, home location, and satisfaction in walking trips. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 50, 198–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2013.01.044
Moura, F., Cambra, P., & Gonçalves, A. (2017). Measuring walkability for distinct pedestrian groups with a participatory assessment method: A case study in Lisbon. Landscape and Urban Planning, 157, 282–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.07.002
Notthoff, N., & Carstensen, L. (2017). Promoting walking in older adults: Perceived neighborhood walkability influences the effectiveness of motivational messages. Journal of Health Psychology, 22(7), 834–843. https://doi.10.1177/1359105315616470
Nyunt, M., Shuvo, F., Eng, J., Yap, K., Scherer, S., Hee, L., . . . Ng, T. (2015). Objective and subjective measures of neighborhood environment (NE): Relationships with transportation physical activity among older persons. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 12(1), 1–10.
Ortiz-Ramirez, H., Vallejo-Borda, J., & Rodriguez-Valencia, A. (2021). Staying on or getting off the sidewalk? Testing the Mehrabian-Russell Model on pedestrian behavior. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behavior, 78, 480–494.
Sallis, J., Cain, K., Conway, T., Gavand, K., Millstein, R., Geremia, C., . . . King, A. (2015). Is your neighborhood designed to support physical activity? A brief streetscape audit tool. Preventing Chronic Disease, 12, 150008. https://doi.10.5888/pcd12.150098
Shashank, A., & Schuurman, N. (2019). Unpacking walkability indices and their inherent assumptions. Health & Place, 55, 145–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2018.12.005
Shuvo, F., Mazumdar, S., & Labib, S. (2021). Walkability and greenness do not walk together: Investigating associations between greenness and walkability in a large metropolitan city context. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(9), 4429. htttps://doi.10.3390/ijerph18094429
Suarez-Balcazar, Y., Early, A., Garcia, C., Balcazar, D., Arias, D., & Morales, M. (2020). Walkability safety and walkability participation: A health concern. Health Education & Behavior, 47(3), 430–438. https://doi.10.1177/1090198120903256
Tobin, M., Hajna, S., Orychock, K., Ross, N., DeVries, M., Villeneuve, P., . . . Fuller, D. (2022). Rethinking walkability and developing a conceptual definition of active living environments to guide research and practice. BMC Public Health, 22(1), 450. https://doi.10.1186/s12889-022-12747-3
Tuckel, P., & Milczarski, W. (2015). Walk score (TM), perceived neighborhood walkability, and walking in the US. American Journal of Health Behavior, 39(2), 241–255. https://doi.10.5993/ajhb.39.2.11
Wasfi, R., Steinmetz-Wood, M., & Kestens, Y. (2017). Place matters: A longitudinal analysis measuring the association between neighborhood walkability and walking by age group and population center size in Canada. PLoS ONE, 12(12), e0189472.
Yameqani, A., & Alesheikh, A. (2019). Predicting subjective measures of walkability index from objective measures using artificial neural networks. Sustainable Cities and Society, 48, 101560. https://doi.10.1016/j.scs.2019.101560
Yang, Y., & Diez-Roux, A. (2017). Adults’ daily walking for travel and leisure: Interaction between attitude toward walking and the neighborhood environment. American Journal of Health Promotion, 31(5), 435–443.
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2022 Lancelot Rodrigue, Julie Daley, Léa Ravensbergen, Kevin Manaugh, Rania Wasfi , Gregory Butler, Ahmed El-Geneidy
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with JTLU agree to the following terms: 1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial License 4.0 that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. 2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal. 3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.