Journal of Transport and Land Use

A review of the housing market-clearing process in integrated land-use and transport models

Yicong Liu

University of Toronto

Eric J. Miller

University of Toronto

Khandker Nurul Habib

University of Toronto

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5198/jtlu.2023.2268

Keywords: Residential Location Choice Model, Integrated Land-use and Transport Model, Housing Market Clearing Process

---

Abstract

The land-use/transport interaction (LUTI) modeling framework has become the current state of best practice for analyzing the interdependency between the land-use and transportation systems. This paper presents a comprehensive review of the housing market-clearing mechanisms used in operational LUTI models. Market clearing is a critical component of modeling housing markets, but a systematic review and critique of the current state of the art have not previously been undertaken. In the review paper, the theoretical foundations for modeling household location choice are reviewed, including bid-rent and random utility theories. Five LUTI models are discussed in detail: two equilibrium models, MUSSA and RELU-TRAN, and three dynamic disequilibrium models, UrbanSim, ILUTE, and SimMobility. The discussion focuses on the following key points: the assumptions embedded in the models, the aggregation level of households and locations, computational cost and operationalization of the models. One of the challenges is that there are rarely any empirical studies that compare the performance of equilibrium and dynamic models in the same study context. Future research is recommended to empirically investigate the pros and cons of the two modeling approaches and compare the model performances for their representativeness of real-world behavior, computational efficiencies, and abilities for policy analysis. More sophisticated studies about the impacts of agents’ behavior on the housing market-clearing process are also recommended.

---

References

Acheampong, R. A., & Silva, E. A. (2015). Land use–transport interaction modeling: A review of the literature and future research directions. Journal of Transport and Land Use, 8(3), 11–38.

Adnan, M., Pereira, F., Lima Azevedo, C., Basak, K., Lovric, M., Raveau, S., … & Ben-Akiva, M. (2016, January 11). SimMobility: A multi-scale integrated agent-based simulation platform. Paper presented at the Transportation Research Board 95th Annual Meeting, January 10–14, Washington, DC.

Alonso, W. (1960). A theory of the urban land market. Papers in Regional Science, 6(1), 149–157. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1435-5597.1960.tb01710.x

Anas, A. (2013). A summary of the applications to date of RELU-TRAN, a microeconomic urban computable general equilibrium model. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 40(6), 959–970. https://doi.org/10.1068/b38206

Anas, A., & Arnott, R. J. (1991). Dynamic housing market equilibrium with taste heterogeneity, idiosyncratic perfect foresight, and stock conversions. Journal of Housing Economics, 1(1), 2–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1051-1377(05)80023-3

Anas, A., & Arnott, R. J. (1993). Development and testing of the Chicago prototype housing market model. Journal of Housing Research, 4(1), 73–129.

Anas, A., & Liu, Y. (2007). A regional economy, land use, and transportation model (relu-Tran©): Formulation, algorithm design, and testing*. Journal of Regional Science, 47(3), 415–455. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9787.2007.00515.x

Basu, R., & Ferreira, J. (2020). A LUTI microsimulation framework to evaluate long-term impacts of automated mobility on the choice of housing-mobility bundles. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 47(8), 1397–1417. https://doi.org/10.1177/2399808320925278

Ben-Akiva, M., & Bowman, J. L. (1998). Integration of an activity-based model system and a residential location model. Urban Studies, 35(7), 1131–1153. https://doi.org/10.1080/0042098984529

Beykaei, S. A., Miller, E. J., & Vaughan, J. (2014). Testing the stochastic behavior of a microsimulation model of demographic and housing market dynamics. Presented at the Second World Symposium in Transport and Land Use Research, Delft, June 26, 2014.

Cordera, R., Ibeas, Á., dell’Olio, L., & Alonso, B. (Eds.). (2017). Land use–transport interaction models. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780203711811

de la Barra, T., Pérez, B., & Vera, N. (1984). TRANUS-J: Putting large models into small computers. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 11(1), 87–101. https://doi.org/10.1068/b110087

Dong, X., Ben-Akiva, M. E., Bowman, J. L., & Walker, J. L. (2006). Moving from trip-based to activity-based measures of accessibility. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 40(2), 163–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2005.05.002

Ellickson, B. (1981). An alternative test of the hedonic theory of housing markets. Journal of Urban Economics, 9(1), 56–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/0094-1190(81)90048-6

Farooq, B., & Miller, E. J. (2012). Towards integrated land use and transportation: A dynamic disequilibrium based microsimulation framework for built space markets. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 46(7), 1030–1053. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2012.04.005

Fujita, M. (1989). Urban economic theory: Land use and city size. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Guevara, C. A., & Ben-Akiva, M. (2006). Endogeneity in residential location choice models. Transportation Research Record, 1977(1), 60–66. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198106197700108

Habib, M. A. (2009). Microsimulating residential mobility and location choice processes within an integrated land use and transportation modelling system (PhD thesis), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Habib, M. A., & Miller, E. J. (2009). Reference-dependent residential location choice model within a relocation context. Transportation Research Record, 2133(1), 92–99. https://doi.org/10.3141/2133-10

Haider, M. (2003). Spatio-temporal modelling of housing starts in the Greater Toronto Area. Toronto, Ontario: University of Toronto.

Hawkins, J., & Nurul Habib, K. (2019). Integrated models of land use and transportation for the autonomous vehicle revolution. Transport Reviews, 39(1), 66–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2018.1449033

Hunt, J. D., & Abraham, J. E. (2005). Design and implementation of PECAS: A generalized system for allocating economic production, exchange and consumption quantities. In M. E.H. Lee-Gosselin & S. T. Doherty (Eds.), Integrated land-use and transportation models (pp. 253–273). Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/9781786359520-011

Hunt, J. D., Kriger, D. S., & Miller, E. J. (2005). Current operational urban land‐use–transport modelling frameworks: A review. Transport Reviews, 25(3), 329–376. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144164052000336470

Hurtubia, R. (2012). Discrete choice and microsimulation methods for agent-based land use modeling.

Hurtubia, R., Martínez, F., Flötteröd, G., & Bierlaire, M. (2010). Comparative analysis of hedonic rents and maximum bids in a land-use simulation context. 20.

Hurtubia, R., Martinez, F. J., & Bierlaire, M. (2019). A quasi-equilibrium approach for market clearing in land use microsimulations. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 46(3), 445–468. https://doi.org/10.1177/2399808317719071

Kryvobokov, M., Chesneau, J.-B., Bonnafous, A., Delons, J., & Piron, V. (2013). Comparison of static and dynamic land use–transport interaction models: Pirandello and UrbanSim applications. Transportation Research Record, 2344(1), 49–58. https://doi.org/10.3141/2344-06

Lerman, S. R. (1976). Location, housing, automobile ownership, and mode to work: A joint choice model. Transportation Research Record, 610, 6–11. https://trid.trb.org/view/53665

Lerman, S. R., & Kern, C. R. (1983). Hedonic theory, bid rents, and willingness-to-pay: Some extensions of Ellickson’s results. Journal of Urban Economics, 13(3), 358–363. https://doi.org/10.1016/0094-1190(83)90039-6

Lopes, A. S., Loureiro, C. F. G., & van Wee, B. (2019). LUTI operational models review based on the proposition of an a priori ALUTI conceptual model. Transport Reviews, 39(2), 204–225. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2018.1442890

Martínez. (1992). The bid—choice land-use model: An integrated economic framework. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 24(6), 871–885. https://doi.org/10.1068/a240871

Martínez, F. (1996). MUSSA: Land use model for Santiago City. Transportation Research Record, 1552(1), 126–134. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198196155200118

Martínez, F. (2018). Microeconomic modeling in urban science. Cambridge, MA : Academic Press.

Martínez, F., Aguila, F., & Hurtubia, R. (2009). The constrained multinomial logit: A semi-compensatory choice model. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 43(3), 365–377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2008.06.006

Martínez, F., & Donoso, P. (2010). The MUSSA II land use auction equilibrium model. In F. Pagliara, J. Preston, & D. Simmonds (Eds.), Residential location choice: Models and applications (pp. 99–113). Berlin: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12788-5_5

Martínez, F., & Hurtubia, R. (2006). Dynamic model for the simulation of equilibrium status in the land use market. Networks and Spatial Economics, 6(1), 55–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11067-006-7685-4

McFadden, D. (1977). Modelling the choice of residential location. Transportation Research Record, 673, 72–77.

Miller, E. J. (2018a). The case for microsimulation frameworks for integrated urban models. Journal of Transport and Land Use, 11(1), 1025–1037. https://doi.org/10.5198/jtlu.2018.1257

Miller, E. J. (2018b). Viewpoint: Integrated urban modeling: Past, present, and future. Journal of Transport and Land Use, 11(1), 387–399. https://doi.org/10.5198/jtlu.2018.1273

Miller, E. J., Farooq, B., Chingcuanco, F., & Wang, D. (2011). Historical validation of integrated transport–land use model system. Transportation Research Record, 2255(1), 91–99. https://doi.org/10.3141/2255-10

Moeckel, R. (2016). Constraints in household relocation: Modeling land-use/transport interactions that respect time and monetary budgets. Journal of Transport and Land Use, 10(1), 211–228. https://doi.org/10.5198/jtlu.2015.810

Moeckel, R., Llorca Garcia, C., Moreno Chou, A. T., & Okrah, M. B. (2018). Trends in integrated land use/transport modeling: An evaluation of the state of the art. Journal of Transport and Land Use, 11(1), 463–476. https://doi.org/10.5198/jtlu.2018.1205

Moeckel, R., Schwarze, B., Spiekermann, K., & Wegener, M. (2007, June). Simulating interactions between land use, transport and environment. In Proceedings of the 11th World Conference on Transport Research. Berkeley, CA: University of California at Berkeley.

Renner, C. Z., Nicolai, T. W., & Nagel, K. (2015). Agent-based land use transport interaction modeling: State of the art. In Integrated transport and land use modeling for sustainable cities (p. 31). Vaud, Switzerland: EPFL Press.

Rose, J. M., & Martínez, F. J. (2007). Towards a land-use and transport interaction framework. In D. A. Hensher & K. J. Button (Eds.), Handbook of transport modelling (Vol. 1, pp. 181–201). Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/9780857245670-009

Rosen, S. (1974). Hedonic prices and implicit markets: Product differentiation in pure competition. Journal of Political Economy, 82(1), 34–55. https://doi.org/10.1086/260169

Rosenfield, A., Chingcuanco, F., & Miller, E. J. (2013). Agent-based housing market microsimulation for integrated land use, transportation, environment model system. Procedia Computer Science, 19, 841–846. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2013.06.112

Salvini, P., & Miller, E. J. (2005). ILUTE: An operational prototype of a comprehensive microsimulation model of urban systems. Networks and Spatial Economics, 5(2), 217–234. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11067-005-2630-5

Simmonds, D., Waddell, P., & Wegener, M. (2013). Equilibrium versus dynamics in urban modelling. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 40(6), 1051–1070. https://doi.org/10.1068/b38208

Vickrey, W. (1961). Counterspeculation, auctions, and competitive sealed tenders. The Journal of Finance, 16(1), 8–37. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1961.tb02789.x

Waddell, P. (2000). A behavioral simulation model for metropolitan policy analysis and planning: Residential location and housing market components of urbansim. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 27(2), 247–263. https://doi.org/10.1068/b2627

Waddell, P. (2002). UrbanSim: Modeling urban development for land use, transportation, and environmental planning. Journal of the American Planning Association, 68(3), 297–314. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944360208976274

Waddell, P. (2010). Modeling residential location in UrbanSim. In F. Pagliara, J. Preston, & D. Simmonds (Eds.), Residential location choice (pp. 165–180). Berlin: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12788-5_8

Waddell, P. (2011). Integrated land use and transportation planning and modelling: Addressing challenges in research and practice. Transport Reviews, 31(2), 209–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2010.525671

Waddell, P., Borning, A., Ševčíková, H., & Socha, D. (2006). Opus (Open Platform for Urban Simulation) and UrbanSim 4. Proceedings of the 2006 National Conference on Digital Government Research, 360–361. https://doi.org/10.1145/1146598.1146702

Wang, Y., & Wu, L. (2010). Integrated land-use and transportation models. Paper presented at the18th International Conference on Geoinformatics, Peking University, Beijing, China, June 19-20. https://doi.org/10.1109/GEOINFORMATICS.2010.5567835

Wegener, M. (2011). From macro to micro—how much micro is too much? Transport Reviews, 31(2), 161–177. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2010.532883

Wegener, M., & Fuerst, F. (2004). Land-use transport interaction: State of the art (SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 1434678). Social Science Research Network. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1434678

Zhu, Y., Diao, M., Ferreira, J., & Zegras, P. C. (2018). An integrated microsimulation approach to land-use and mobility modeling. Journal of Transport and Land Use, 11(1), 633–659.

Ziemke, D., Nagel, K., & Moeckel, R. (2016). Towards an agent-based, integrated land-use transport modeling system. Procedia Computer Science, 83, 958–963. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2016.04.192