Exploring practices for facilitating integrated strategic land use and transport planning in the Nordic countries

Sofia Eckersten

KTH Royal Institute of Technology

Berit Balfors

KTH Royal Institute of Technology

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0214-3921

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5198/jtlu.2023.2350

Keywords: collaboration, environmental goals, policy instrument, climate impact


Abstract

Drawing on examples from the Nordic countries, this article aims to explore the practical application of strategic policy and planning instruments and approaches that facilitate the integration of land use and transport planning and promote sustainable policy measures through collaboration among stakeholders across various governance levels. This research applies a qualitative research design including literature research, interviews, and workshops involving practitioners from the five Nordic countries. In this paper, we present an overview of the planning structure in the Nordic countries, including institutions that govern land use and transport planning. We identify different approaches to bridge the gap between land use and transport planning, such as the Finger Plan in Denmark, MAL in Finland, Concept Studies in Norway, and Strategic Choice of Measures in Sweden. Many of the examples employ informal collaborative approaches among authorities to form a shared vision and seek consensus on a combination of policy measures and actions. The paper examines collaborative approaches in relation to regulatory planning and discusses the role of these processes in advancing integrated land use and transport planning and fostering sustainable urban development.


Author Biographies

Sofia Eckersten, KTH Royal Institute of Technology

Doctoral Student

Berit Balfors, KTH Royal Institute of Technology

Professor at the Institution of Sustainable Development, Environmental Science and Engineering

 

References

Allen, C., Metternicht, G., & T. Wiedmann, T. (2018). Initial progress in implementing the sustainable development goals (SDGs): A review of evidence from countries. Sustainability Science, 13(5),1453–1467. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-018-0572-3

Allmendinger, P., & Haughton, G. (2009). Soft spaces, fuzzy boundaries, and metagovernance: The new spatial planning in the Thames gateway. EPA: Economy and Space, 41(3), 617–633. https://doi.org/10.1068/a40208

Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2007). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. JPART, 18(4), 543–571. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum032

Arts, J., Hanekamp, T., Linssen, R., & Snippe, J. (2016). Benchmarking integrated infrastructure planning across Europe—Moving forward to vital infrastructure networks and urban regions. Transportation Research Procedia, 14, 303–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2016.05.024

Balfors, B., & Gunnarsson-Östling, U. (2021). Strategisk miljöbedömning och nationell transportplanering. In L. Eriksson, K. Isaksson, & J. Witzell (Eds.), På väg mot hållbar omställning? - Kunskap, makt och mening i nationell transportplanering (pp. 95–104). Boxholm, Sweden: Linnefors förlag.

Banister, D. (2005). Unsustainable transport: City transport in the new century. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203003886

Barfod, M. B., Leleur, S., Gudmundsson, H., Sørensen, C. H., & Greve, C. (2018). Promoting sustainability through national transport planning. EJTIR, 18(3), 250–261. https://doi.org/10.18757/ejtir.2018.18.3.3236

Behrends, S., Fredricsson, C., Lund, E., & Sköld, S. (2019). Samverkansformer mellan nationella och lokala myndigheter för att underlätta målstyrd vägplanering. Retrieved from https://www.ivl.se/download/18.694ca0617a1de98f4739bc/1628417386117/FULLTEXT01.pdf

Brinkmann, S., & Kvale, S. (2014). InterViews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing (3rd ed.). Los Angeles: Sage Publications.

Bryman, A. (2016). Social research methods (5th ed.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Candel, J. J. L., & Biesbroek, R. (2016). Towards a processual understanding of policy integration. Policy Sciences, 49, 211–231. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-016-9248-y

COMPASS. (2018). Comparative analysis of territorial governance and spatial planning systems in Europe (Final report). Luxembourg: ESPON and TU Deft.

Danish Ministry of Environment. (2015). The Finger Plan. A strategy for the Development of the Greater Copenhagen Area. Copenhagen: The Danish Nature Agency.

De Jong, M., & Geerlings, H. (2005). Exchanging experiences in transport infrastructure policies between Denmark and the Netherlands. International Journal of Technology, Policy and Management, 5(2), 181–199. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTPM.2005.007520

Dolowitz, D. P., & Marsh, D. (1996). Who learns what from whom: A review of the policy transfer literature. Political Studies, 44(2), 343–357. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.1996.tb00334.x

Duffhues, J., & Bertolini, L. (2016). From integrated aims to fragmented outcomes: Urban intensification and transportation planning in the Netherlands. Journal of Transport and Land Use, 9(3), 15–34. https://doi.org/10.5198/jtlu.2015.571

Duman, O., Mäntysalo, R., Granqvist, K., Johnson, E., & Ronikonmäki, N.-M. (2022). Challenges in land use and transport planning integration in Helsinki metropolitan region—A historical-institutional perspective. Sustainability, 14(1), 146. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14010146

Eckersten, S., Balfors, B., & Gunnarsson-Östling, U. (2021). Challenges and opportunities in early stage planning of transport infrastructure projects: Environmental aspects in the strategic choice of measures approach. Sustainability, 13(3),1295. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031295

Finnish Government. (2021). The national transport system plan for 2021–2032 (Report 2021:77). https://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-952-383-804-8

Geerlings, H., & Stead, D. (2003). The integration of land use planning, transport and environment in European policy and research. Transport Policy, 10(3), 187–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0967-070X(03)00020-9

Glaser, M., Te Brömmelstroet, M., & Bertolini, L. (2019). Learning to build strategic capacity for transportation policy change: An interdisciplinary exploration. TRIP, 1,100006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2019.100006

Government Bill. (2008). Mål för framtidens resor och transporter 2008 09:93. Stockholm: Swedish Government.

Granqvist, K., Sarjamo, S., & Mäntysalo, R. (2019). Polycentricity as spatial imaginary: The case of Helsinki city plan. European Planning Studies, 27(4), 739–758. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2019.1569596

Howlett, M. (2008). Managing the “hollow state”: Procedural policy instruments and modern governance. Canadian Public Administration, 43(4), 412–431. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1754-7121.2000.tb01152.x

Hrelja, R., Pettersson, F., & Westerdahl, S. (2016). The qualities needed for a successful collaboration: A contribution to the conceptual understanding of collaboration for efficient public transport. Sustainability, 8(6), 542. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8060542

Hrelja, R., Rye, T., & Mullen, C. (2018). Partnerships between operators and public transport authorities: Working practices in relational contracting and collaborative partnerships. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 116, 327–338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2018.06.032

Hull, A. (20050. Integrated transport planning in the UK: From concept to reality. Journal of Transport Geography, 13(4), 318–328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2004.12.002

Högström, J., Balfors, B., & Hammer, M. (2017). Planning for sustainability in expansive metropolitan regions: Exploring practices and planners’ expectations in Stockholm, Sweden. European Planning Studies, 26(3), 439–457. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2017.1391751

IRCA (Icelandic Road and Coastal Administration). (2017). The road system 2017. Retrieved from https://www.road.is/vefur2.nsf/Files/RoadSystem2017/$file/vegakerfid2017-enska.pdf

Ingo, S. (2013). Swedish transport planning—A new deal in a new reality. In M. J. Lundström, C. Fredriksson, & J. Witzell (Eds.), Planning and sustainable urban development in Sweden (pp. 111–132). Stockholm: Swedish Society for Town and Country Planning.

Isaksson, K., Antonson, H., & Eriksson, L. (2017). Layering and parallel policy making—Complementary concepts for understanding implementation challenges related to sustainable mobility. Transport Policy, 53, 50–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2016.08.014

Jalali, S., & Wohlin, C. (2012). Systematic literature studies: Database searches vs. backward snowballing. Proceedings of the 2012 ACM-IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement, 29–38. https://doi.org/10.1145/2372251.2372257

Johansson, F., Tornberg, P., & Fernström, A. (2018). A function-oriented approach to transport planning in Sweden: Limits and possibilities from a policy perspective. Transport Policy, 63, 30–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2017.11.006

Keast, R., Brown, K., & Mandell, M. (2007). Getting the right mix: Unpacking integration meanings and strategies. International Public Managment Journal, 10(1), 9–33. https://doi.org/org.10.1080/10967490601185716

Lavallée, M., Robillard, P.-N., & Mirsalari, R. (2014). Performing systematic literature reviews with novices: An iterative approach. IEEE Transactions on Education, 57(3), 175–181. https://doi.org/10.1109/TE.2013.2292570

Lidmo, J., Bogason, A., & Turunen, E. (2020). The legal framework and national policies for urban greenery and green values in urban areas—A study of legislation and policy documents in the five Nordic countries and two European outlooks. Copenhagen: Nordic Council of Ministers, Nordic Walking Group for Sustainable Cities.

Lundgren, A., Löfving, L., & Westin, L. (2023). Cross-border transport infrastructure planning in the Nordic Region—An introduction. Copenhagen: Nordic Council of Ministers, Nordic Walking Group for Sustainable Cities.

Löfgren, S. (2020). Considering landscape in practices of transport planning (Doctoral thesis), Luleå University of Technology, Luleå, Sweden.

Marsden, G., & Reardon, L. (2017). Questions of governance: Rethinking the study of transportation policy. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 101, 238–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2017.05.008

Myllymäki, A. (2021). Defining the role of walking in strategic level land use and transport planning—Lessons from the Nordics for the Helsinki Region Land Use, Housing and Transport Plan (Master’s thesis), Aalto University, Espoo, Finland. https://aaltodoc.aalto.fi/handle/123456789/110572

Mäntysalo R., & Bäcklund, P. (2017). The governance of planning: Flexibly networked, yet institutionally grounded. In M. Gunder, A. Madanipour, & V. Watson (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Planning Theory (pp. 237–249). Abingdon-on-Thames, England: Routledge.

Mäntysalo, R., Granqvist, K., Duman, O., & Mladenović, M. N. (2022). From forecasts to scenarios in strategic city-regional land-use and transportation planning. Regional Studies, 57(4), 629–641. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2022.2058699

Nordic Council of Ministers. (2020). Nordisk arbetsplan för hållbar utveckling i perioden 2021-2024 (Report 2020:721). https://doi.org/10.6027/politiknord2020-721

Norwegian Ministry of Transport. (2020). National transport plan 2022-2033 (English summary, white paper). Retrieved from https://www.regjeringen.no/no/dokumenter/meld.-st.-20-20202021/id2839503/

Pettersson, F., & Hrelja, R. (2020). How to create functional collaboration in theory and in practice—Practical experiences of collaboration when planning public transport system. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 14(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2018.1517842

Pettersson, F., Westerdahl, S., & Hansson, J. (2018). Learning through collaboration in the Swedish public transport sector? Coproduction through guidelines and living labs. Research in Transportation Economics, 69, 394–401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.retrec.2018.07.010

Planning and Building Act. (2010). SFS 2010:900. Stockholm: The Swedish National Board of Housing, Building and Planning.

Puustinen, S., Mäntysalo, R., Hytönen, J., & Jarenko, K. (2017). The ‘deliberative bureaucrat’: Deliberative democracy and institutional trust in the jurisdiction of the Finnish planner. Planning Theory & Practice, 18(1), 71–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2016.1245437

Rose, R. (2004). Learning from comparative public policy: A practical guide. Abingdon-on-Thames, England: Routledge.

Saevarsdottir, B. (2020). A study on early-stage transport planning in the Nordic countries—With special focus on collaboration and integration of environmental aspects (Master’s thesis], KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm.

Sjölund, A., Bergkvist, J., Rundcrantz, K., & Lundin, U. (2016). Anpassning av transportinfrastrukturen som ett bidrag till en fungerande grön infrastruktur. Planera, bygga och sköta (Report 2016:133). Borlänge, Sweden: Swedish Road Administration.

SNBHBP. (2020). Internationell förstudie av nationella anspråk i fysisk planering—Uppdrag 5 i Boverkets regleringsbrev 2020 (Report 2020:29). Stockholm: Swedish National Board of Housing, Building and Planning.

Sovacool, B. K., Noel, L., Kester, J., & Zarazua de Rubens, G. (2018). Reviewing Nordic transport challenges and climate policy priorities: Expert perceptions of decarbonization in Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway, Sweden. Energy, 165, 532–542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.09.110

STA. (2014). Strategic choice of measures, A new step for planning of transportation solutions. Handbook (Report 2013:176). Borlänge: Swedish Transport Administration.

STA. (2015). Regeringsuppdrag om stadsmiljöavtal, slutredovisning (Government assignment on urban environment agreement, report 2015:078). Borlänge: Swedish Transport Administration.

STA. (2021). Trafikverkets miljörapport 2021 (STA’s environmental report for 2021, report 2022:008). Borlänge: Swedish Transport Administration.

Stanley, J. (2023). Opportunity equity in strategic urban land use transport planning: Directions in London and Vancouver. Transp. Policy, 136, 137–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2023.03.019

Stead, D. (2003). Are transport and land-use planning policy really coordinated? International Social Science Journal, 176, 371–387. https://doi.org/10.3917/riss.176.0371

Stead, D. (2021). Conceptualizing the policy tools of spatial planning. Journal of Planning Literature, 36(3), 297–311. https://doi.org/10.1177/0885412221992283

Stead, D., & Geerlings, H. (2005). Integrating transport, land use planning and environment policy: Views of practitioners from Denmark, England and Germany. Innovation, 18(4), 443–453. https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610500384194

Stockholm Negotiations. (2007). Samlad trafiklösning Stockholmsregionen för miljö och tillväxt-2020 med utblick mot 2030. Retrieved from https://www.regeringen.se/contentassets/dbe6b0ffa7844f258e9aa0c78795ba50/samlad-trafiklosning-stockholmsregionen-for-miljo-och-tillvaxt---till-2020-med-utblick-mot-2030/

Te Brömmelstroet, M., & Bertolini, L. (2010). Integrating land use and transport knowledge in strategy-making. Transportation, 37, 85–104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-009-9221-0

Tennøy, A., Hansson, L. Lissandrello, E., & Næss, P. (2016). How planners’ use and non-use of expert knowledge affect the goal achievement potential of plans: Experiences from strategic land-use and transport planning processes in three Scandinavian cities. Progress in Planning, 109, 1–32. https://doi.org./10.1016/j.progress.2015.05.002

Thomas, R., & Bertolini, L. (2015). Policy transfer among planners in transit-oriented development. Town Planning Review, 86(5), 537–560. https://doi.org/10.3828/tpr.2015.32

Tornberg, P., & Odhage, J. (2018). Making transport planning more collaborative? The case of strategic choice of measures in Swedish transport planning. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 118, 416–429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2018.09.020

Tønnesen, A. (2015). Policy packages and state engagement: Comparing car-use reduction policy in two Norwegian cities. Journal of Transportation Geography, 46, 89–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2015.06.006

Tønnesen, A., Knapskog, M., Rynning, M. K., & Groven, K. (2022). Planning for climate-friendly transport in Norwegian rural areas. Transportation Research Part D, 102, 103156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2021.103156

Tønnesen, A., Runde Krogstad, J., Christiansen, P., & Isaksson, K. (2019). National goals and tools to fulfil them: A study of opportunities and pitfalls in Norwegian metagovernance of urban mobility. Transport Policy, 81, 35–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2019.05.018

UNEP. (2019). Systemic policy approaches for cross-cutting issues — Global environment outlook (GEO-6): Healthy planet, healthy people Chapter 17. New York: United Nations Environmental Program. https://wedocs.unep.org/20.500.11822/27669

UNEP. (2021). Making peace with nature — A scientific blueprint to tackle the climate, biodiversity and pollution emergencies (DEW/2335/NA). New York: United Nations Environment Program. https://wedocs.unep.org/xmlui/bitstream/handle/20.500.11822/34948/MPN.pdf

UN-Habitat. (2013). Planning and design for sustainable urban mobility: Global report on human settlements 2013. Abingdon-on-Thames, England: Routledge. https://unhabitat.org/sites/default/files/2013/06/GRHS.2013_Rev.2014.01_00.pdf

van Geet, M. T., Busscher, T., Lenferink, S., & Arts, J. (2021). Finding the right tools for the job: Instrument mixes for land use and transport integration in the Netherlands. Journal of Transport and Land Use, 14(1), 125–149. https://doi.org/10.5198/jtlu.2021.1710

van Geet, M. T., Lenferink, S., Arts, J., & Leendertse, W. (2019). Understanding the ongoing struggle for land use and transport integration: Institutional incongruence in the Dutch national planning process. Transport Policy, 73, 84–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2018.11.001

Westskog, H., Amundsen, H., Christiansen, P. & Tønnesen, A. (2020). Urban contractual agreements as an adaptive governance strategy: Under what conditions do they work in multi-level cooperation? Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 22(4), 554–567. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/1523908X.2020.1784115