The attributes of residence/workplace areas and transit commuting
Bumsoo Lee
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Peter Gordon
University of Southern California
James E. Moore
University of Southern California
Harry W. Richardson
University of Southern California
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5198/jtlu.v4i3.310
Keywords:
Commuting, Transit, Neighborhoods, Residence, Workplace
Abstract
Area type matters when we try to explain variations in public transit commuting; workplace (commuting destination) type matters more than residence (origin) type. We found this statistical link over a sample of all census tracts in the four largest California metropolitan areas: Los Angeles, San Francisco, San Diego, and Sacramento. In this research, we used a statistical cluster analysis to identify twenty generic residence neighborhood types and fourteen workplace neighborhood types. The variables used in the analysis included broad indicators of location and density, street design, transit access, and highway access. Once identified, the denser neighborhoods had higher transit commuting, other things equal. Yet what distinguishes this research is that we did not use a simple density measure to differentiate neighborhoods. Rather, density was an important ingredient of our neighborhood-type definition, which surpassed simple density in explanatory power.
Author Biographies
Bumsoo Lee, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
A
Peter Gordon, University of Southern California
Professor, School of Policy, Planning and Development
James E. Moore, University of Southern California
Professor, Daniel J. Epstein Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering
Harry W. Richardson, University of Southern California
James Irvine Professor of Urban and Regional Planning, School of Policy, Planning and Development
