Does where you live affect how much you spend on transit? The link between urban form and household transit expenditures in Mexico City

Erick Guerra


Long and expensive transit trips burden millions of households in many low- and middle-income cities. Geography likely plays an important role. In Mexico City, suburban households earn 30% less than urban households, have 40% longer commutes, and spend nearly twice as much per transit trip. This paper examines the relationship between where households live in Mexico City and how much they spend on transit using a large metropolitan household travel survey matched to measures of the built environment. Transit expenditures vary systematically with neighborhood population density, land-use diversity, municipal job density, street network density, and distance to the metro and urban center. These relationships are complex and nonlinear but robust with the inclusion of household income, size, and structure. They are also relatively strong with job density, destination diversity, distance to the metro, and population density being as strongly correlated with transit expenditures as household income. In dollar values, the savings associated with more convenient household locations are substantial and in the same ballpark as total metro fare revenues and a back-of-the-envelope estimate of the total daily external costs of suburban congestion.


transit, built environment, travel costs, urban form, Mexico City

Full Text:



Alonso, W. (1960). A theory of the urban land market. Papers in Regional Science, 6(1), 149–157.

Alonso, W. (1964). Location and land use. Toward a general theory of land rent. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Ben-Akiva, M., & Lerman, S. (1985). Discrete choice analysis: Theory and application to travel demand (1st ed.). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

Bhat, C. R., & Gossen, R. (2004). A mixed multinomial logit model analysis of weekend recreational episode type choice. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 38(9), 767–787.

Boarnet, M. (2006). About this issue: Planning’s role in building healthy cities: An introduction to the special issue. Journal of the American Planning Association, 72(1), 5–9.

Boarnet, M. (2011). A broader context for land use and travel behavior, and a research agenda. Journal of the American Planning Association, 77(3), 197–213.

Boarnet, M., Greenwald, M., & McMillan, T. (2008). Walking, urban design, and health: Toward a cost-benefit analysis framework. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 27(3), 341–358.

Brownstone, D. (2008). Key relationships between the built environment and VMT (Special Report No. 298). Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board. Retrieved from

Brownstone, D., & Golob, T. F. (2009). The impact of residential density on vehicle usage and energy consumption. Journal of Urban Economics, 65(1), 91–98.

Brueckner, J. K. (1987). The structure of urban equilibria: A unified treatment of the Muth-Mills model. In E. S. Mills (Ed.), Handbook of regional and urban economics (pp. 821–845). New York: Elsevier.

Cao, X., Mokhtarian, P., & Handy, S. (2009). Examining the impacts of residential self‐selection on travel behavior: A focus on empirical findings. Transport Reviews, 29(3), 359–395.

Center for Neighborhood Technology. (n.d.). The H+T Affordability Index. Retrieved from

Cervero, R. (2007). Transit-oriented development’s ridership bonus: A product of self-selection and public policies. Environment and Planning A, 39(9), 2068–2085.

Chatman, D. (2003). How density and mixed uses at the workplace affect personal commercial travel and commute mode choice. Transportation Research Record, 1831(1), 193–201.

Crôtte, A., Graham, D., & Noland, R. (2011). The role of metro fares, income, metro quality of service and fuel prices for sustainable transportation in Mexico City. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 5(1), 1–24.

Crôtte, A., Noland, R., & Graham, D. (2009). Is the Mexico City metro an inferior good? Transport Policy, 16(1), 40–45.

Davis, D. (1994). Urban leviathan: Mexico City in the twentieth century. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

Ewing, R., Bartholomew, K., Winkelman, S., Walters, J., & Chen, D. (2008). Growing cooler: The evidence on urban development and climate change. Washington, DC: Urban Land Institute.

Ewing, R., & Cervero, R. (2001). Travel and the built environment: A synthesis. Transportation Research Record, 1780, 87–114.

Ewing, R., & Cervero, R. (2010). Travel and the built environment: A meta-analysis. Journal of the American Planning Association, 76(3), 265–294.

Glaeser, E., Kahn, M., & Rappaport, J. (2008). Why do the poor live in cities? The role of public transportation. Journal of Urban Economics, 63(1), 1–24.

Golob, T., & van Wissen, L. (1989). A joint household travel distance generation and car ownership model. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 23(6), 471–491.

Greenwald, M. (2003). The road less traveled: New urbanist inducements to travel mode substitution for nonwork trips. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 23(1), 39–57.

Guerra, E. (2014). The built environment and car use in Mexico City: Is the relationship changing over time? Journal of Planning Education and Research, 34(4), 394–408.

Guerra, E. (2015a). Has Mexico City’s shift to commercially produced housing increased car ownership and car use? Journal of Transport and Land Use, 8(2), 171–189.

Guerra, E. (2015b). The geography of car ownership in Mexico City: A joint model of households’ residential location and car ownership decisions. Journal of Transport Geography, 43, 171–180.

Guerra, E., & Kirschen, M. (2016). Housing plus transportation affordability indices: Uses, opportunities, and challenges. Technical paper for OECD round-table on income inequality, social inclusion, and mobility. Paris: Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development.

INEGI. (2007). Encuesta Origen—Destino de los Viajes de los Residentes de la Zona Metropolitana del Valle de México 2007. Mexico City: Instituto Nacional de Estadística, Geografía e Informática.

INEGI. (2012). Sistema Estatal y Municipal de Bases de Datos. Retrieved from

INEGI. (2013). Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía. Retrieved from

INEGI. (2015). Encuesta Intercensal. 2015. Retrieved from

Islas Rivera, V. (2000). Llegando tarde al compromiso: La crisis del transporte en la ciudad de México. Distrito Federal: El Colegio de México, Centro de Estudios Demográficos y de Desarrollo Urbano, Programa sobre Ciencia, Tecnología y Desarrollo.

Lee, Y., Washington, S., & Frank, L. (2009). Examination of relationships between urban form, household activities, and time allocation in the Atlanta metropolitan region. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 43(4), 360–373.

Mills, E. (1972). Studies in the structure of the urban economy. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins Press.

Mokhtarian, P., & Cao, X. (2008). Examining the impacts of residential self-selection on travel behavior: A focus on methodologies. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 42(3), 204–228.

Monkkonen, P. (2011). The housing transition in Mexico: Expanding access to housing finance. Urban Affairs Review, 47(5), 672–695.

Montejano, J., Caudillo, C., & Cárdenas, J. (2016). Contesting Mexico City’s alleged polycentric condition through a centrality-mixed land-use composite index. Urban Studies, 53 (11), 2380–2396.

Muth, R. (1969). Cities and housing; The spatial pattern of urban residential land use. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

OECD. (2015). OECD territorial reviews: Valle de México, Mexico. Paris: OECD Publishing.

OpenStreetMap Wiki contributors. (2015). OpenStreetMap Wiki. Retrieved from

Parry, I., & Strand, J. (2012). International fuel tax assessment: An application to Chile. Environment and Development Economics, 17(2), 127–144.

Rajamani, J., Bhat, C., Handy, S., Knaap, G., & Song, Y. (2003). Assessing impact of urban form measures on nonwork trip mode choice after controlling for demographic and level-of-service effects. Transportation Research Record, 1831(1), 158–165.

Schwanen, T., & Mokhtarian, P. (2005). What if you live in the wrong neighborhood? The impact of residential neighborhood type dissonance on distance traveled. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 10(2), 127–151.

SETRAVI. (2013). Portal de la Secretaría de Transportes y Vialidad del Gobierno del Distrito Federal. Retrieved from

Small, K., & Verhoef, E. (2007). The economics of urban transportation (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.

Small, K., & Winston, C. (1999). The demand for transportation: Models and applications. In J. Gomez-Ibanez, W. B. Tye, & C. Winston (Eds.), Essays in transportation economics and policy: A handbook in honor of John R (pp. 11–56). Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.

Stevens, M. (2017). Does compact development make people drive less? Journal of the American Planning Association, 83(1), 7–18.

Suárez, M., & Delgado, J. (2007). La expansión urbana probable de la Ciudad de México. Un escenario pesimista y dos alternativos para el año 2020. Estudios Demográficos y Urbanos, 22(1), 101–142.

Suárez, M., Murata, M., & Delgado, J. (2016). Why do the poor travel less? Urban structure, commuting and economic informality in Mexico City. Urban Studies, 53(12) 2548–2566.

Train, K. (2009). Discrete choice methods with simulation (2nd ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press. Retrieved from

van Wissen, L., & Golob, T. (1992). A dynamic model of car fuel-type choice and mobility. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 26(1), 77–96.

Ward, P. (1998). Mexico City. West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Wirth, C. (1997). Transportation policy in Mexico City. Urban Affairs Review, 33(2), 155–181.

WRI Ross Center for Sustainable Cities. (2011, June 7). Snapshot/Martita [video file]. Retrieved from

Zegras, C. (2010). The built environment and motor vehicle ownership and use: Evidence from Santiago de Chile. Urban Studies, 47(8), 1793–1817.