Mode choice in access and egress stages of high-speed railway travelers in China
AbstractHigh-speed railway (HSR) has become a sustainable transport mode for inter-city travel, especially in China. As public transport (PT), the use of HSR involves access and egress to and from HSR stations. However, the literature focusing on the intra-city mode choice of HSR travelers is limited, especially regarding their differential socio-demographic and trip characteristics. This paper aims to fill that gap with an analysis of access/egress mode choice for business and leisure journeys in the Yangzi River Delta region. Using the HSR survey from Fudan University, we found that in China older and wealthier travelers have a strong preference for car use. For leisure travel, the explanatory power of the socio-demographic variables is much more influential in the egress than the access stage. With increasing access time, business travelers may be enticed to shift to a faster form of PT (e.g., subway rather than bus) in the access stage. With increasing line-haul time, only business travelers have a stronger preference for car use as their intra-city mode choice for business activities. A higher number of subway lines and diversity of land use around HSR stations is associated with less car use for business travelers in the egress stage.
Algers, S. (1993). Integrated structure of long-distance travel behavior models in Sweden. Transportation Research Record, 1413, 141–149.
Allard, R. F., & Moura, F. (2016). The incorporation of passenger connectivity and intermodal considerations in intercity transport planning. Transport Reviews, 36(2), 251–277. doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2015.1059379
Arduin, J., & Ni, J. (2005). French TGV network development. Japan Railway & Transport Review, 40(March), 22–28. Retrieved from http://www.jrtr.net/jrtr40/pdf/f22_ard.pdf
Banister, D., & Givoni, M. (2013). High-speed rail in the EU-27: Trends, time, accessibility and principles. Built Environment, 39(3), 324–338. Retrieved from http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/alex/benv/2013/00000039/00000003/art00002
Ben-Akiva, M. E., & Lerman, S. R. (1985). Discrete choice analysis: Theory and application to travel demand (Vol. 9). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Brons, M., Givoni, M., & Rietveld, P. (2009). Access to railway stations and its potential in increasing rail use. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 43(2), 136–149. doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2008.08.002
Brons, M., & Rietveld, P. (2009). Improving the quality of the door-to-door rail journey : A customer-oriented approach. Built Environment, 35(1), 122–135.
Cervero, R. (2001). Walk-and-ride: Factors influencing pedestrian access to transit. Journal of Public Transportation, 3, 1–23.
Cervero, R., & Duncan, M. (2003). Walking, bicycling, and urban landscapes: Evidence from the San Francisco Bay Area. American Journal of Public Health, 93(9), 1478–1483. doi.org/ 10.2105/AJPH.93.9.1478
Cervero, R. (2002). Built environments and mode choice: Toward a normative framework. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 7(4), 265–284. doi.org/10.1016/S1361-9209(01)00024-4
Chen, C.-L. (2012). Reshaping Chinese space-economy through high-speed trains: Opportunities and challenges. Journal of Transport Geography, 22, 312–316. doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.01.028
Chen, C., & Wei, B. (2013). High-speed rail and urban transformation in China: The case of Hangzhou East Rail Station. Built Environment, 39(3), 385–398. Retrieved from http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/alex/benv/2013/00000039/00000003/art00006
Chen, L., Pel, A., Chen, X., Sparing, D., & Hansen, I. (2012). Determinants of bicycle transfer demand at metro stations. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2276(November), 131–137. doi.org/10.3141/2276-16
Commins, N., & Nolan, A. (2011). The determinants of mode of transport to work in the Greater Dublin Area. Transport Policy, 18(1), 259–268. doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2010.08.009
Crockett, J., & Hounsell, N. (2005). Role of the travel factor convenience in rail travel and a framework for its assessment. Transport Reviews, 25(5), 535–555. doi.org/10.1080/01441640500064389
Dieleman, F. M., Dijst, M., & Burghouwt, G. (2002). Urban form and travel behavior: Micro-level household attributes and residential context. Urban Studies, 39(3), 507–527. doi.org/10.1080/0042098022011280
Dobruszkes, F., Dehon, C., & Givoni, M. (2014). Does European high-speed rail affect the current level of air services? An EU-wide analysis. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 69, 461–475. doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2014.09.004
Ettema, D., & Schwanen, T. (2012). A relational approach to analyzing leisure travel. Journal of Transport Geography, 24, 173–181. doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.01.023
Ewing, R., & Cervero, R. (2010). Travel and the built environment. Journal of the American Planning Association, 76(3), 265–294. doi.org/10.1080/01944361003766766
Farag, S., & Lyons, G. (2012). To use or not to use? An empirical study of pre-trip public transport information for business and leisure trips and comparison with car travel. Transport Policy, 20, 82–92. doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2011.03.007
Feng, J. (2017). The influence of built environment on travel behavior of the elderly in urban China. Transportation Research Part D, 52, 619–633. doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2016.11.003
Feng, J., Dijst, M., Wissink, B., & Prillwitz, J. (2014). Understanding mode choice in the Chinese context: The case of Nanjing metropolitan area. Tijdschrift Voor Economische En Sociale Geografie, 105(3), 315–330. doi.org/10.1111/tesg.12068
Feng, J., Dijst, M., Wissink, B., & Prillwitz, J. (2017). Changing travel behavior in urban China: Evidence from Nanjing 2008-2011. Transport Policy, 53, 1–10. doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2016.08.011
Givoni, M. (2006). Development and impact of the modern high‐speed train: A Review. Transport Reviews, 26(5), 593–611. doi.org/10.1080/01441640600589319
Givoni, M., & Rietveld, P. (2007). The access journey to the railway station and its role in passengers’ satisfaction with rail travel. Transport Policy, 14(5), 357–365. doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2007.04.004
Jiang, C. S., Deng, Y. F., Hu, C., Ding, H., & Chow, W. K. (2009). Crowding in platform staircases of a subway station in China during rush hours. Safety Science, 47(7), 931–938. doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2008.10.003
Kim, S., & Ulfarsson, G. F. (2008). Curbing automobile use for sustainable transportation: Analysis of mode choice on short home-based trips. Transportation, 35(6), 723–737. doi.org/10.1007/s11116-008-9177-5
Krygsman, S., Dijst, M., & Arentze, T. (2004). Multimodal public transport: An analysis of travel time elements and the interconnectivity ratio. Transport Policy, 11(3), 265–275. doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2003.12.001
Limtanakool, N., Dijst, M., & Schwanen, T. (2006). The influence of socioeconomic characteristics, land use and travel time considerations on mode choice for medium- and longer-distance trips. Journal of Transport Geography, 14(5), 327–341. doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2005.06.004
Liu, S., & Kesteloot, C. (2015). High-speed rail and rural livelihood: The Wuhan-Guangzhou Line and Qiya Village. Tijdschrift Voor Economische En Sociale Geografie, 107(4), 469–483. doi.org/10.1111/tesg.12169
Liu, X., & Long, Y. (2016). Automated identification and characterization of parcels with OpenStreetMap and points of interest. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 43(2), 341–360. doi.org/10.1177/0265813515604767
Martens, K. (2004). The bicycle as a feedering mode: Experiences from three European countries. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 9(4), 281–294. doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2004.02.005
Martin, E. W., & Shaheen, S. A. (2014). Evaluating public transit modal shift dynamics in response to bikesharing: A tale of two U.S. cities. Journal of Transport Geography, 41, 315–324. doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2014.06.026
Martín, J. C., Román, C., García-Palomares, J. C., & Gutiérrez, J. (2014). Spatial analysis of the competitiveness of the high-speed train and air transport: The role of access to terminals in the Madrid–Barcelona corridor. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 69, 392–408. doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2014.09.010
Pan, H., Shen, Q., & Zhang, M. (2009). Influence of urban form on travel behavior in four neighborhoods of Shanghai. Urban Studies, 46(2), 275–294. doi.org/10.1177/0042098008099355
Pels, E., Nijkamp, P., & Rietveld, P. (2003). Access to and competition between airports: A case study for the San Francisco Bay area. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 37(1), 71–83. doi.org/10.1016/S0965-8564(02)00007-1
Scheiner, J. (2010a). Interrelations between travel mode choice and trip distance: Trends in Germany 1976-2002. Journal of Transport Geography, 18(1), 75–84. doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2009.01.001
Scheiner, J. (2010b). Social inequalities in travel behavior: Trip distances in the context of residential self-selection and lifestyles. Journal of Transport Geography, 18(6), 679–690. doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2009.09.002
Schwanen, T., Dijst, M., & Dieleman, F. M. (2001). Leisure trips of senior citizens: Determinants of modal choice. Tijdschrift Voor Economische En Sociale Geografie, 92(3), 347–360. doi.org/10.1111/1467-9663.00161
Shen, Y., Chai, Y., & Kwan, M. P. (2015). Space-time fixity and flexibility of daily activities and the built environment: A case study of different types of communities in Beijing suburbs. Journal of Transport Geography, 47, 90–99. doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2015.06.014
Stronegger, W. J., Titze, S., & Oja, P. (2010). Perceived characteristics of the neighborhood and its association with physical activity behavior and self-rated health. Health and Place, 16(4), 736–743. doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2010.03.005
Sun, B., Ermagun, A., & Dan, B. (2017). Built environmental impacts on commuting mode choice and distance: Evidence from Shanghai. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 52, 441–453. doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2016.06.001
Tapiador, F. J., Burckhart, K., & Martí-Henneberg, J. (2009). Characterizing European high speed train stations using intermodal time and entropy metrics. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 43(2), 197–208. doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2008.10.001
Wang, D. (2015). Place, context and activity-travel behavior: Introduction to the special section on geographies of activity-travel behavior. Journal of Transport Geography, 47, 84–89. doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2015.08.019
Wang, J. J., Xu, J., & He, J. (2013). Spatial impacts of high-speed railways in China: A total-travel-time approach. Environment and Planning A, 45(9), 2261–2280. doi.org/10.1068/a45289
Wen, C.-H., Wang, W.-C., & Fu, C. (2012). Latent class nested logit model for analyzing high-speed rail access mode choice. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 48(2), 545–554. doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2011.09.002
Yang, M., Zhao, J., Wang, W., Liu, Z., & Liu, Z. (2015). Metro commuters’ satisfaction in multi-type access and egress transferring groups. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 34, 179–194. doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2014.11.004
Zhang, M. (2004). The role of land use in travel mode choice — evidence from Boston and Hong kong. Journal of the American Planning Association, 70(March 2015), 344–360. doi.org/10.1080/01944360408976383
Zhang, W. (2016). Does compact land use trigger a rise in crime and a fall in ridership? A role for crime in the land use–travel connection. Urban Studies, 53(14), 3007–3026. doi.org/10.1177/0042098015605222
Zhang, W., & Zhang, M. (2018). Incorporating land use and pricing policies for reducing car dependence: Analytical framework and empirical evidence. Urban Studies, 55(13), 3012–3033. doi.org/10.1177/0042098017720150
Zhao, P., & Li, S. (2017). Bicycle-metro integration in a growing city: The determinants of cycling as a transfer mode in metro station areas in Beijing. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 99, 46–60. doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2017.03.003
Copyright (c) 2019 Haoran Yang, Martin Dijst, Jianxi Feng, Dick Ettema
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with JTLU agree to the following terms: 1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial License 4.0 that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. 2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal. 3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.