Driving change: Exploring the adoption of multimodal local traffic impact assessment practices





traffic impact assessment, development review, multimodal, practice change


Local governments in the US face growing public demands to reduce automobile dependence in order to forestall climate change, improve road safety, rein in sprawling peripheral land development, increase transportation equity, and enhance urban livability. As a result, many city and county leaders are looking for ways to provide alternatives to driving through the creation of more multimodal-supportive transportation systems and land use patterns. The academic literature has identified conventional traffic impact- assessment (TIA) practices—designed to ensure new developments do not increase automobile traffic congestion—as a barrier to supporting these multimodal efforts. Because of the growing emphasis on multimodality in many national, state, and regional policies and initiatives (e.g., Complete Streets, Vision Zero), we investigate whether and how communities were adapting TIA practices to better accommodate pedestrians, bicyclists, transit users, and other non-car travel modes in the land development process.


Bochner, B. S., Currans, K. M., Dock, S. P., Clifton, K. J., Gibson, P. A., … & Tierney, L. F. (2016). Advances in urban trip generation estimation. ITE Journal, 86(7), 17–19.

Boushey, G. (2012). Punctuated equilibrium theory and the diffusion of innovations. Policy Studies Journal, 40(1), 127–146.

Brody, S. D., Carrasco, V., & Highfield, W. E. (2006). Measuring the adoption of local sprawl: Reduction planning policies in Florida. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 25(3), 294–310. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X05280546

Clifton, K. J., Currans, K. M., & Muhs, C. D. (2015). Adjusting ITE’s trip generation handbook for urban context. Journal of Transport and Land Use, 8(1), 5–29.

Combs, T. S., McDonald, N. C., & Leimenstoll, W. (2020). Evolution in local traffic impact assessment practices. Journal of Planning Education and Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X20908928

Currans, K. M. (2017). Issues in trip generation methods for transportation impact estimation of land use development: A review and discussion of the state-of-the-art approaches. Journal of Planning Literature, 32(4), 335–345. https://doi.org/10.1177/0885412217706505

DDOT. (2014). Trip generation data collection in urban areas. District of Columbia Department of Transportation. Retrieved from https://umjp9n8g2j2ft5j5637up17u-wpengine.netdna-ssl.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/2014-01_Urban-Trip-Generation-Final-Report.pdf

DDOT. (2019). Guidance for comprehensive transportation review (p. 143). Washington, DC: District of Columbia Department of Transportation.

de Gruyter, C. (2019). Multimodal trip generation from land use developments: International synthesis and future directions. Transportation Research Record, 2673, 136–152. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198119833967

De Vries, H., Bekkers, V., & Tummers, L. (2016). Innovation in the public sector: A systematic review and future research agenda. Public Administration, 94(1), 146–166. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12209

DeRobertis, M., Eells, J., Kott, J., & Lee, R. W. (2014). Changing the paradigm of traffic impact studies: How typical traffic studies inhibit sustainable transportation. ITE Journal, 84(5), 30–35.

Elefteriadou, L., Dowling, R. G., & Ryus, P. (2015). Exploring multimodal analysis in the highway capacity manual 2010. ITE Journal, 85(2), 27–31.

Governor’s Office of Planning and Research. (2019). Transportation impacts (SB 743). Retrieved from http://opr.ca.gov/ceqa/updates/sb-743/

Handy, S. (2015). Trip generation: Introduction to the special section. Journal of Transport and Land Use, 8(1), 1–4.

Howell, A., Currans, K., Gehrke, S., Norton, G., & Clifton, K. (2018). Transportation impacts of affordable housing: Informing development review with travel behavior analysis. Journal of Transport and Land Use, 11(1), 103–118. https://doi.org/10.5198/jtlu.2018.1129

Institute of Transportation Engineers. (2017). Trip generation manual (10th ed.). Washington, DC: Institute of Transportation Engineers. https://www.ite.org/page-for-layout/

Jun, K.-N., & Weare, C. (2011). Institutional motivations in the adoption of innovations: The case of e-government. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory: J-PART, 21(3), 495–519.

LaJeunesse, S., Heiny, S., Evenson, K. R., Fiedler, L. M., & Cooper, J. F. (2018). Diffusing innovative road safety practice: A social network approach to identifying opinion leading U.S. cities. Traffic Injury Prevention, 19(8), 832–837. https://doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2018.1527031

Lee, A. E., & Handy, S. L. (2018). Leaving level-of-service behind: The implications of a shift to VMT impact metrics. Research in Transportation Business & Management, 29, 14–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rtbm.2018.02.003

Manville, M. (2017). Automatic street widening: Evidence from a highway dedication law. Journal of Transport and Land Use, 10(1), 375–393. https://doi.org/10.5198/jtlu.2016.834

Maryland State Highway Administration. (2016). Draft guidelines for traffic impact reports/studies. Retrieved from https://www.roads.maryland.gov/mdotsha/pages/Index.aspx?PageId=393

Millard-Ball, A. (2015). Phantom trips: Overestimating the traffic impacts of new development. Journal of Transport and Land Use, 8(1), 31–49.

NCDOT. (2015). NCDOT congestion management capacity analysis guidelines [Instructions]. Retrieved from https://connect.ncdot.gov/resources/safety/Congestion%20Mngmt%20and%20Signing/Congestion%20Management/Capacity%20Analysis%20Guidelines.pdf

Nehme, E. K., Pérez, A., Ranjit, N., Amick, B. C., & Kohl, H. W. (2016). Behavioral theory and transportation cycling research: Application of diffusion of innovations. Journal of Transport & Health, 3(3), 346–356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2016.05.127

Schneider, R. J., Shafizadeh, K., & Handy, S. L. (2015). Method to adjust Institute of Transportation Engineers vehicle trip-generation estimates in smart-growth areas. Journal of Transport and Land Use, 8(1), 69–83.

Shafizadeh, K., Lee, R., Niemeier, D., Parker, T., & Handy, S. (2012). Evaluation of operation and accuracy of available smart growth trip generation methodologies for use in California. Transportation Research Record, 2307(1), 120–131. https://doi.org/10.3141/2307-13

Shipan, C. R., & Volden, C. (2008). The mechanisms of policy diffusion. American Journal of Political Science, 52(4), 840–857. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2008.00346.x

Steiner, R. L. (1998). Trip generation and parking requirements in traditional shopping districts. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1617, 28–37.

VDOT. (2012). Traffic impact analysis regulations (24VAC30-155). Retrieved from https://www.vdot.virginia.gov/projects/resources/chapter527/Traffic_Impact_Analysis_Regulations_24VAC30-155_1.2012.pdf

VDOT. (2019, October 18). Traffic impact analysis regulations. Retrieved from https://www.vdot.virginia.gov/info/traffic_impact_analysis_regulations.asp

Walker, R. M., Avellaneda, C. N., & Berry, F. S. (2011). Exploring the diffusion of innovation among high and low innovative localities: A test of the Berry and Berry model. Public Management Review, 13(1), 95–125. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2010.501616

Walters, J., Bochner, B., & Ewing, R. (2013). Getting trip generation right. In Eliminating the bias against mixed use development. Chicago: American Planning Association (APA).




How to Cite

Combs, T., & McDonald, N. (2021). Driving change: Exploring the adoption of multimodal local traffic impact assessment practices. Journal of Transport and Land Use, 14(1), 47–64. https://doi.org/10.5198/jtlu.2021.1730