Infrastructure is not enough: Interactions between the environment, socioeconomic disadvantage, and cycling participation in England
Keywords:active travel, cycling, equity, health inqualities, England, Environmental justice, bicycling, utility cycling, leisure cycling, transport equity, physical activity
Cycling can be particularly beneficial for socioeconomically disadvantaged populations. First, because it can allow them to access opportunities that by other modes they may not afford. Secondly, because it can increase their physical activity levels and, consequently, improve their health. We analyse the extent to which socioeconomic disadvantage impacts on cycling participation in England, for both leisure and utility cycling. Then, we explore the extent to which this impact could be explained by the environment in which disadvantaged populations live. The study population includes 167,178 individuals, residing in 2,931 areas, and 326 Local Authorities. Data on individual factors were drawn from the Active Lives Survey, and data on environmental factors from several sources. Descriptive statistics and multilevel logistic models were estimated. The likelihood of cycling is lower among people living in deprived areas than among people living in non-deprived areas. This difference is significant for leisure, but also for utility cycling when controlling for individual and environmental factors. The study also found that cycling infrastructure and greater levels of cyclability are higher in deprived areas than in non-deprived areas. This suggests that infrastructure and cyclability are not enough to increase cycling levels among disadvantaged populations. Further research on other barriers to cycling among disadvantaged populations is required.
Bandeira, A. d. S., K. S. da Silva, G. F. Del Duca, G. R. Zilch, E. S. A. de Oliveira, M. V. G. de Barros, and M. V. Nahas. 2017. Factors associated with bicycle use for commuting and for leisure among Brazilian workers. Sport Sciences for Health, 13(1):63–68. ISSN 1824-7490, 1825-1234. doi: 10.1007/s11332-017-0350-0. URL http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11332-017-0350-0.
Bratman, E. and A. J. Jul. 2014. How Low-Income Commuters View Cycling. In The Future of Transportation, p. 4. CITYLAB. URL https://www.citylab.com/transportation/2014/07/how-low-income-commuters-view-cycling/374390/.
Braun, L. M., D. A. Rodriguez, and P. Gordon-Larsen. 2019. Social (in)equity in access to cycling infrastructure: Cross-sectional associations between bike lanes and area-level sociodemographic characteristics in 22 large US cities. Journal of Transport Geography, 80:102544. ISSN 09666923. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2019.102544. URL https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S096669231830930X.
Brussel, M. and M. Zuidgeest. 2012. Chapter 8 Cycling in Developing Countries: Context, Challenges and Policy Relevant Research. In Cycling and Sustainability. Emerald Group Publishing Limited. ISBN 978-1-78052-298-2.
Clark, J. and A. Curl. 2016. Bicycle and car share schemes as inclusive modes of travel? A socio-spatial analysis in Glasgow, UK. Social Inclusion, 4(3):83. ISSN 2183-2803. doi: 10.17645/si.v4i3.510. URL http://www.cogitatiopress.com/ojs/index.php/socialinclusion/article/view/510.
Cycle Streets. 2020. Journey Planner - plan a cycle journey. URL https://www.cyclestreets.net. DfCLG. 2015. e English Indices of Deprivation 2015: Research report. p. 94. URL https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/english-indices-of-deprivation-2015.
Df T. 2017. Cycling and Walking Investment Strategy. p. 38. URL https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/874708/cycling-walking-investment-strategy.pdf.
Dill, J. and T. Carr. 2003. Bicycle commuting and facilities in major US cities: If you build them, commuters will use them. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1828(1):116–123. ISSN 0361-1981, 2169-4052. doi: 10.3141/1828-14. URL http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.3141/1828-14.
Droomers, M. 2001. Educational level and decreases in leisure time physical activity: Predictors from the longitudinal GLOBE study. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 55(8):562–568. ISSN 0143005X. doi: 10.1136/jech.55.8.562. URL http://jech.bmj.com/cgi/doi/10.1136/jech.55.8.562.
Edwards, P., J. Green, I. Roberts, C. Grundy, and K. Lachowycz. 2006. Deprivation and Road Safety in London: A report to the London Road Safety Unit. Technical report, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine.
Fraser, S. D. and K. Lock. 2011. Cycling for transport and public health: A systematic review of the effect of the environment on cycling. European Journal of Public Health, 21(6):738–743. ISSN 1464-360X, 1101-1262. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckq145. URL https://academic.oup.com/eurpub/article-lookup/doi/10.1093/eurpub/ckq145.
Fuller, D. and M. Winters. 2017. Income inequalities in Bike Score and bicycling to work in Canada. Journal of Transport & Health, 7:264–268. ISSN 22141405. doi: 10.1016/j.jth.2017.09.005. URL https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2214140517301573.
Garrard, J., C. Rissel, and A. E. Bauman. 2012. Health Benefits of Cycling. In City cycling (Vol. 11). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Giles-Corti, B. 2002. Socioeconomic status differences in recreational physical activity levels and real and perceived access to a supportive physical environment. Preventive Medicine, 35(6):601–611. ISSN 00917435. doi: 10.1006/pmed.2002.1115. URL https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0091743502911151
Goodman, A. 2013. Walking, cycling and driving to work in the English and Welsh 2011 Census: Trends, socio-economic patterning and relevance to travel behaviour in general. PLoS ONE, 8(8):e71790. ISSN 1932-6203. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0071790. URL http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0071790.
Goodman, A. and J. Cheshire. 2014. Inequalities in the London bicycle sharing system revisited: Impacts of extending the scheme to poorer areas but then doubling prices. Journal of Transport Geography, 41:272–279. ISSN 09666923. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2014.04.004. URL http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0966692314000659.
Green, J., R. Steinbach, P. Edwards, and J. Datta. 2010. Cycling in London: A study of social and cultural factors in transport mode choice. Technical Report, LSHTM, London.
Handy, S. L. and Y. Xing. 2011. Factors correlated with bicycle commuting: A study in six small us cities. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 5(2):91–110. ISSN 1556-8318, 1556-8334. doi: 10.1080/15568310903514789. URL http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/15568310903514789.
Heesch, K. C., B. Giles-Corti, and G. Turrell. 2015. Cycling for transport and recreation: Associations with the socio-economic, natural and built environment. Health & Place, 36:152–161. ISSN 13538292. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2015.10.004. URL http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1353829215001458.
Heinen, E., B. van Wee, and K. Maat. 2010. Commuting by bicycle: An overview of the literature. Transport Reviews, 30(1):59–96. ISSN 01441647. doi: 10.1080/01441640903187001. URL http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01441640903187001.
Ipsos MORI. 2019. Active Lives Survey 2017/2018 Year 3 Technical Report. Technical report, Ipsos MORI Social Research Institute.
James, G., D. Witten, T. Hastie, and R. Tibshirani. 2013. An Introduction to Statistical Learning, volume 103 of Springer Texts in Statistics. New York, NY: Springer New York. ISBN 978-1-4614-7137-0 978-1-4614-7138-7. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4614-7138-7. URL http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-1-4614-7138-7.
Kamphuis, C. B. M., K. Giskes, A. M. Kavanagh, L. E. Thornton, L. R. Thomas, F. J. van Lenthe, J. P. Mackenbach, and G. Turrell. 2008. Area variation in recreational cycling in Melbourne: A compositional or contextual effect? Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 62(10):890–898. ISSN 0143-005X. doi: 10.1136/jech.2007.067116. URL http://jech.bmj.com/cgi/doi/10.1136/jech.2007.067116.
Kremers, S. P. J., G.-J. de Bruijn, T. L. S. Visscher, D. J. H. Deeg, G. C. F. omése, M. Visser, W. van Mechelen, and J. Brug. 2012. Associations between safety from crime, cycling, and obesity in a Dutch elderly population: Results from the Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam. Journal of Environmental and Public Health, 2012. ISSN 1687-9805. doi: 10.1155/2012/127857. URL https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3317166/.
Lee, R. E., H. J. Adamus-Leach, K. C. Cheung, E. G. Soltero, Y. Lopez, F. Saavedra, M. Noor, and S. K. Mama. 2012. Researching those who have the most to gain: Focused physical activity promotion in lower socioeconomic populations. Current Cardiovascular Risk Reports, 6(4):355–361. ISSN 1932-9520, 1932-9563. doi: 10.1007/s12170-012-0243-3. URL http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12170-012-0243-3.
Lindström, M., B. S. Hanson, and P.-O. Östergren. 2001. Socioeconomic differences in leisure-time physical activity: e role of social participation and social capital in shaping health related behaviour. Social Science & Medicine, 52(3):441–451. ISSN 02779536. doi: 10.1016/S0277-9536(00)00153-2. URL https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0277953600001532.
Lovelace, R., A. Goodman, R. Aldred, N. Berkoff, A. Abbas, and J. Woodcock. 2017. e Propensity to Cycle Tool: An open source online system for sustainable transport planning. Journal of Transport and Land Use, 10(1). ISSN 1938-7849. doi: 10.5198/jtlu.2016.862. URL https://www.jtlu.org/index.php/jtlu/article/view/862.
Lynch, J. W., G. A. Kaplan, R. D. Cohen, J. Tuomilehto, and J. T. Salonen. 1996. Do cardiovascular risk factors explain the relation between socioeconomic status, risk of all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, and acute myocardial infarction? American Journal of Epidemiology, 144(10):934–942. ISSN 0002-9262, 1476-6256. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a008863. URL https://academic.oup.com/aje/article-lookup/doi/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a008863.
Margo, R. A. 1992. Explaining the postwar suburbanization of population in the United States: The role of income. Journal of Urban Economics, 31(3):301–310. ISSN 00941190. doi: 10.1016/0094-1190(92)90058-S. URL https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/009411909290058S.
McNeil, N. 2011. Bikeability and the 20-min neighborhood: How infrastructure and destinations influence bicycle accessibility. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2247(1):53–63. ISSN 0361-1981, 2169-4052. doi: 10.3141/2247-07. URL http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.3141/2247-07.
Mieszkowski, P. and E. S. Mills. 1993. e causes of metropolitan suburbanization. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 7(3):135–147. ISSN 0895-3309. doi: 10.1257/jep.7.3.135. URL http://pubs.aeaweb.org/doi/10.1257/jep.7.3.135.
Mills, E. S. and L. Sende Lubuele. 1997. Inner Cities. Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 35, No. 2:727–756. URL https://www.jstor.org/stable/2729791.
Mitchell, G. and D. Dorling. 2003. An environmental justice analysis of British air quality. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 35(5):909–929. ISSN 0308-518X, 1472-3409. doi: 10.1068/a35240. URL http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/a35240.
Oja, P., S. Titze, A. Bauman, B. de Geus, P. Krenn, B. Reger-Nash, and T. Kohlberger. 2011. Health benefits of cycling: A systematic review: Cycling and health. Scandinaian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports, 21(4):496–509. ISSN 09057188. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0838.2011.01299.x. URL http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/j.1600-0838.2011.01299.x.
ONS. 2019. Lower layer Super Output Area population density (National Statistics). URL https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/populationandmigration/populationestimates/datasets/lowersuperoutputareapopulationdensity.
Parkin, J., M. Wardman, and M. Page. 2008. Estimation of the determinants of bicycle mode share for the journey to work using census data. Transportation, 35(1):93–109. ISSN 00494488. doi: 10.1007/s11116-007-9137-5.
Pistoll, C. and A. Goodman. 2014. e link between socioeconomic position, access to cycling infrastructure and cycling participation rates: An ecological study in Melbourne, Australia. Journal of Transport & Health, 1(4):251–259. ISSN 22141405. doi: 10.1016/j.jth.2014.09.011. URL https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2214140514000796.
Plaut, P. O. 2005. Non-motorized commuting in the US. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 10(5):347–356. ISSN 13619209. doi: 10.1016/j.trd.2005.04.002. URL https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1361920905000179.
Prelog, R. 2015. Equity of Access to Bicycle Infrastructure: GIS methods for investigating the equity of access to bike infrastructure. Technical report, e League of American Bicyclists. URL https://bikeleague.org/sites/default/files/bike_equity_index_final_web.pdf.
Prince, S. A., K. B. Adamo, M. Hamel, J. Hardt, S. Connor Gorber, and M. Tremblay. 2008. A comparison of direct versus self-report measures for assessing physical activity in adults: A systematic review. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 5(1):56. ISSN 1479-5868. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-5-56. URL http://ijbnpa.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1479-5868-5-56.
Pucher, J. and R. Buehler. 2008. Cycling for everyone: Lessons from Europe. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2074(1):58–65. ISSN 0361-1981, 2169-4052. doi: 10.3141/2074-08. URL http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.3141/2074-08.
Pucher, J., R. Buehler, D. R. Bassett, and A. L. Dannenberg. 2010. Walking and cycling to health: A comparative analysis of city, state, and international data. American Journal of Public Health, Infrastructure is not enough 100(10):1986–1992. ISSN 00900036. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2009.189324.
Pucher, J., C. Komanoff, and P. Schimek. 1999. Bicycling renaissance in North America?: Recent trends and alternative policies to promote bicycling. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 33(7):625–654. ISSN 0965-8564. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0965-8564(99)00010-5. URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965856499000105.
Sabatini, F. 2006. e Social Spatial Segregation in the Cities of Latin America. Technical report, Inter-American Development Bank. URL https://publications.iadb.org/publications/english/document/The-Social-Spatial-Segregation-in-the-Cities-of-Latin-America.pdf.
Sahlqvist, S. L. and K. C. Heesch. 2012. Characteristics of utility cyclists in Queensland, Australia: An examination of the associations between individual, social, and environmental factors and utility cycling. Journal of Physical Activity and Health, 9(6):818–828. ISSN 1543-3080, 1543-5474.
doi: 10.1123/jpah.9.6.818. URL https://journals.humankinetics.com/view/journals/jpah/9/6/ article-p818.xml.
Schwanen, T. and P. L. Mokhtarian. 2005. What affects commute mode choice: Neighborhood physical structure or preferences toward neighborhoods? Journal of Transport Geography, 13(1):83–99. ISSN 09666923. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2004.11.001. URL https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0966692304000894.
Steinbach, R., J. Green, J. Datta, and P. Edwards. 2011. Cycling and the city: A case study of how gendered, ethnic and class identities can shape healthy transport choices. Social Science & Medicine, 72(7):1123–1130. ISSN 02779536. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.01.033. URL http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0277953611000785.
Teunissen, T., O. Sarmiento, M. Zuidgeest, and M. Brussel. 2015. Mapping equality in access: The case of Bogotá’s sustainable transportation initiatives. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 9(7):457–467. ISSN 1556-8318, 1556-8334. doi: 10.1080/15568318.2013.808388. URL http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/15568318.2013.808388.
Timms, P. and M. Tight. 2010. Aesthetic aspects of walking and cycling. Built Environment, 36(4):487–503. ISSN 02637960. doi: 10.2148/benv.36.4.487. URL http://openurl.ingenta.com/content/xref?genre=article&issn=0263-7960&volume=36&issue=4&spage=487.
Tucker, B. and K. Manaugh. 2018. Bicycle equity in Brazil: Access to safe cycling routes across neighborhoods in Rio de Janeiro and Curitiba. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 12(1):29–38. ISSN 1556-8318, 1556-8334. doi: 10.1080/15568318.2017.1324585. URL https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/15568318.2017.1324585.
University of Leeds. 2019. Cycling Infrastructure Prioritisation Toolkit (CyIPT). URL https://www.cyipt.bike/.
Vasconcellos, E. A. 2001. Non-motorized modes. In Urban Transport, Sosteinability and Social Equity.e Case for Developing Countries., pp. 115–119. Routledge.
Wang, J. and G. Lindsey. 2017. Equity of bikeway distribution in Minneapolis, Minnesota. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2605(1):18–31. ISSN 0361-1981, 2169-4052. doi: 10.3141/2605-02. URL http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.3141/2605-02.
Wang, Y., C. Chau, W. Ng, and T. Leung. 2016. A review on the effects of physical built environment attributes on enhancing walking and cycling activity levels within residential neighborhoods. Cities, 50:1–15. ISSN 02642751. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2015.08.004. URL https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0264275115001158.
Winters, M., M. Brauer, E. M. Setton, and K. Teschke. 2010. Built environment influences on healthy transportation choices: Bicycling versus driving. Journal of Urban Health, 87(6):969–993. ISSN 1099-3460, 1468-2869. doi: 10.1007/s11524-010-9509-6. URL http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11524-010-9509-6.
Winters, M., J. Fischer, T. Nelson, D. Fuller, and D. G. T. Whitehurst. 2018. Equity in spatial access to bicycling infrastructure in mid-sized Canadian cities. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2672(36):24–32. ISSN 0361-1981, 2169-4052. doi: 10.1177/0361198118791630. URL http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0361198118791630.
WYCA. 2019. City Connect: Bradford Leeds Cycle Superhighway. URL https://www.cyclecityconnect.co.uk/our-routes/bradford-leeds-cycle-superhighway/.
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2021 Eugeni Vidal Tortosa, Robin Lovelace, Eva Heinen , Richard P. Mann
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with JTLU agree to the following terms: 1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial License 4.0 that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. 2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal. 3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.