Evaluating demand responsive transit services using a density-based trip rate metric





demand responsive transit, on-demand transit, drt, social equity, transport equity, dial-a-ride, paratransit, spatial analysis, transport and land use, gis


Demand responsive transit (DRT) is attracting increased attention as a means to provide public transit to low-density populations. This research aims to provide a suite of evaluation metrics with low data requirement and widespread availability, so that operators, funders, regulators, and practitioners can better evaluate the performance of DRT services. Trip numbers can be divided by a number of available variables (period, trip length, population, and density) to create a number of derived metrics. By applying these variables across three different DRT service areas in Logan City, Australia, where other key factors are held constant, one can see how different formulations lead to very different readings of DRT system performance. The results confirm the dilemma of cost efficiency versus equity in service provision in low-density environments. This paper also highlights current data limitations and calls for better data collection to facilitate the development of new evaluation methods for DRT services and a new composite metric that can be used for inter-service comparison.

Author Biographies

Benjamin Kaufman, Griffith University

PhD Candidate, Cities Research Institute

Abraham Leung, Griffith University

Post-Doctoral Research Fellow, Cities Research Institute

Matthew Burke, Griffith University

Associate Professor, Cities Research Institute


Alonso-González, M. J., Liu, T., Cats, O., van Oort, N., & Hoogendoorn, S. (2018). The potential of demand-responsive transport as a complement to public transport: An assessment framework and an empirical evaluation. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2672(8), 879–889. http://doi.10.1177/0361198118790842

Behbahani, H., Nazari, S., Jafari Kang, M., & Litman, T. (2018). A conceptual framework to formulate transportation network design problem considering social equity criteria. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 125, 171–183. http://doi.10.1016/j.tra.2018.04.005

Bertolaccini, K., & Lownes, N. (2013). Effects of scale and boundary selection in assessing equity of transit supply distribution. Transportation Research Record, 58–64. http://doi.10.3141/2350-07

Brake, J., Mulley, C., & Nelson, J. D. (2006). Good practice guide for demand responsive transport services using telematics. Newcastle upon Tyne, UK: Newcastle University.

Brake, J., Nelson, J. D., & Wright, S. (2004). Demand responsive transport: Towards the emergence of a new market segment. Journal of Transport Geography, 12(4), 323¬–337. http://doi.10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2004.08.011

Burge, M. (2017, July 11). Demand responsive transport: Coming to an outer metropolitan suburb near you. Jimboomba Times (Jimboomba, Australia). https://www.jimboombatimes.com.au/story/4784275/the-future-of-public-transport-is-demanding-video/

Burke, M., & Brown, L. (2007). Distances people walk for transport. Road & Transport Research: A Journal of Australian and New Zealand Research and Practice, 16(3), 15–29.

Eboli, L., & Mazzulla, G. (2012). Performance indcators for and objective measure of public transport service quality. European Transport, 51, 1–21.

Enoch, M., Potter, S., Parkhurst, G., & Smith, M. (2004). INTERMODE: Innovations in demand responsive transport. London: Department of Transport.

Enoch, M., Potter, S., Parkhurst, G., & Smith, M. (2006). Why do demand responsive transport systems fail? Paper presented at the 85th Annual Meeting of the TRB, Washington, DC.

Ferreira, L., Charles, P., & Tether, C. (2007). Evaluating flexible transport solutions. Transportation Planning and Technology, 30(2–3), 249–269. http://doi.10.1080/03081060701395501

Hansen, W. G. (1959). How accessibility shapes land use. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 25(2), 73–76. http://doi.10.1080/01944365908978307

Heramb, C., Sen, A., & Soot, S. (1979). Jitney paratransit services: An appraisal of present and future operations. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board

Hine, J. (2011). Mobility and transport disadvantage. In M. Grieco & J. Urry (Eds.) Mobilities: New perspectives on transport and society (pp. 21–39). Farnham, UK: Ashgate Publishing.

Ho, S. C., Szeto, W. Y., Kuo, Y.-H., Leung, J. M. Y., Petering, M., & Tou, T. W. H. (2018). A survey of dial-a-ride problems: Literature review and recent developments. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 111, 395–421. http://doi.10.1016/j.trb.2018.02.001

Holoszyc, M. (1979). Dial-a-ride in Rochester: Search for a viable suburban transit alternative. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.

Infrastructure Australia. (2018). Outer urban public transport: Improving accessibility in lower-density areas. Retrieved from https://www.infrastructureaustralia.gov.au/publications/outer-urban-public-transport-improving-accessibility-lower-density-areas

Jain, S., Ronald, N., Thompson, R., & Winter, S. (2017). Predicting susceptibility to use demand responsive transport using demographic and trip characteristics of the population. Travel Behavior and Society, 6, 44–56. http://doi.10.1016/j.tbs.2016.06.001

Kim, M., Schonfeld, P., & Kim, E. (2018). Switching service types for multi-region bus systems. Transportation Planning and Technology, 41(6), 617–643. http://doi.10.1080/03081060.2018.1488930

Leung, A., Burke, M., & Cui, J. (2018). The tale of two (very different) cities–Mapping the urban transport oil vulnerability of Brisbane and Hong Kong. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 65, 796–816. http://doi.10.1016/j.trd.2017.10.011

Li, X., & Quadrifoglio, L. (2010). Feeder transit services: Choosing between fixed and demand responsive policy. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 18(5), 770–780. http://doi.10.1016/j.trc.2009.05.015

Litman, T. (2013). The new transportation planning paradigm. Institute of Transportation Engineers Journal, 83(6), 20–27.

Logan City Council. (2018). Statistics and facts. Retrieved from https://www.logan.qld.gov.au/about-logan/living-in-logan/statistics-and-facts

Lucas, K. (2012). Transport and social exclusion: Where are we now? Transport Policy, 20, 105–113. http://doi.10.1016/j.tranpol.2012.01.013

Lucas, K., Phillips, I., Mulley, C., & Ma, L. (2018). Is transport poverty socially or environmentally driven? Comparing the travel behaviors of two low-income populations living in central and peripheral locations in the same city. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 116, 622–634. http://doi.10.1016/j.tra.2018.07.007

MacDonald, R. (2020). Mobility on demand (MOD) sandbox: Vermont Agency of Transportation (VTrans) flexible trip planner. Barre, VT: Vermont Agency of Transportation.

Martens, K. (2006). Basing transport planning on principles of social justice. Berkeley Planning Journal, 19, 1–17.

Morse, L., Trompet, M., Barron, A., & Graham, D. J. (2017). Development of a key performance indicator system to benchmark relative paratransit performance. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2650(1), 1–8. http://doi.10.3141/2650-01

Mulley, C., & Nelson, J. D. (2009). Flexible transport services: A new market opportunity for public transport. Research in Transportation Economics, 25(1), 39–45. http://doi.10.1016/j.retrec.2009.08.008

Narayan, J., Cats, O., van Oort, N., & Hoogendoorn, S. P. (2020). Fleet size determination for a mixed private and pooled on-demand system with elastic demand. Transportmetrica A: Transport Science. http://doi.10.1080/23249935.2020.1819910

National Academy of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2008). Guidebook for measuring, assessing, and improving performance of demand-response transportation. Washington DC: The National Academies Press.

Nazari Adli, S., Chowdhury, S., & Shiftan, Y. (2019). Justice in public transport systems: A comparative study of Auckland, Brisbane, Perth and Vancouver. Cities, 90, 88–99. http://doi.10.1016/j.cities.2019.01.031

Nelson, J. D., & Phonphitakchai, T. (2012). An evaluation of the user characteristics of an open access DRT service. Research in Transportation Economics, 34(1), 54–65. http://doi.10.1016/j.retrec.2011.12.008

Openshaw, S., & Taylor, P. (1979). A million or so correlation coefficients: Three experiments on the modifiable areal unit problem. In Statistical applications in the spatial sciences (pp. 127–144). London: Wrigley N. Publishers.

Oxley, P. (2007). Dial/a/ride: A review. Transportation Planning and Technology, 6(3), 141–148. http://doi.10.1080/03081068008717184

Papanikolaoua, A., Basbasa, S., Mintsisa, G., & Taxiltaris, C. (2017). A methodological framework for assessing the success of demand responsive transport (DRT) services. Paper presented at the 3rd Conference on Sustainable Urban Mobility, Volos, Greece.

Perera, S., Ho, C., & Hensher, D. (2019). Resurgence of demand responsive transit services – Insights from BRIDJ trials in inner west of Sydney, Australia. Retrieved from https://ses.library.usyd.edu.au/handle/2123/21283

Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press, Harvard.

Reinhardt, L. B., Clausen, T., & Pisinger, D. (2013). Synchronized dial-a-ride transportation of disabled passengers at airports. European Journal of Operational Research, 225(1), 106–117. http://doi.10.1016/j.ejor.2012.09.008

Ryley, T. J., Stanley, P. A., Enoch, M. P., Zanni, A. M., & Quddus, M. A. (2014). Investigating the contribution of demand responsive transport to a sustainable local public transport system. Research in Transportation Economics, 48, 364–372. http://doi.10.1016/j.retrec.2014.09.064

Sen, A. (2009). The idea of justice. Westminster, England: Penguin Books Limited.

Social Exclusion Unit. (2003). Making the connections: Final report on transport and social exclusion. Melbourne, Australia: Social Research In Transport Clearinghouse, Monash University.

Stiglic, M., Agatz, N., Savelsbergh, M., & Gradisar, M. (2015). The benefits of meeting points in ride-sharing systems. Transportation Research Part B-Methodological, 82, 36–53. http://doi.10.1016/j.trb.2015.07.025

Te Brömmelstroet, M., & Bertolini, L. (2009). Integrating land use and transport knowledge in strategy-making. Transportation, 37(1), 85–104. http://doi.10.1007/s11116-009-9221-0

Translink. (2017). Demand responsive transport community consultation report. Brisbane, Australia: Translink.

Translink. (2019). Demand responsive transport trials. Retrieved from https://translink.com.au/travel-with-us/drt

Walker, J. (2011). Human transit: How clearer thinking about public transit can enrich our communities and our lives. Washington, DC: Island Press.

Wang, C., Quddus, M., Enoch, M., Ryley, T., & Davison, L. (2015). Exploring the propensity to travel by demand responsive transport in the rural area of Lincolnshire in England. Case Studies on Transport Policy, 3(2), 129–136. http://doi.10.1016/j.cstp.2014.12.006

White, P. (2016). The roles of ‘conventional’ and demand-responsive bus services. Transport and Sustainability, 8, 307–330. http://doi.10.1108/s2044-994120160000008015

Wright, S., Nelson, J. D., Cooper, J. M., & Murphy, S. (2009). An evaluation of the transport to employment (T2E) scheme in Highland Scotland using social return on investment (SROI). Journal of Transport Geography, 17(6), 457–467. http://doi.10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2008.10.006

Yang, H., & Cherry, C. (2017). Use characteristics and demographics of rural transit riders: A case study in Tennessee. Transportation Planning and Technology, 40(2), 213–227. http://doi.10.1080/03081060.2016.1266168

Zheng, Y., Li, W., & Qiu, F. (2018). A methodology for choosing between route deviation and point deviation policies for flexible transit services. Journal of Advanced Transportation. http://doi.10.1155/2018/6292410




How to Cite

Kaufman, B., Leung, A., & Burke, M. . (2021). Evaluating demand responsive transit services using a density-based trip rate metric. Journal of Transport and Land Use, 14(1), 499-519. https://doi.org/10.5198/jtlu.2021.1796