Pedestrian and transit accessibility on a micro level: Results and challenges


  • Michael A.B. van Eggermond Singapore ETH Centre
  • Alex Erath Singapore ETH Centre



Pedestrian accessibility, transit accessibility, network generation, object-fine, micro-level


In this paper, we connect two notions of accessibility that are more often than not considered separately: pedestrian accessibility and transit accessibility. We move away from the notion of zonal accessibility and measure fine-grained accessibility using door-to-door travel times. Two pedestrian networks are compared to a baseline scenario considering Euclidean distances for a large metropolitan area in which each individual building is considered as an activity opportunity. It is shown that pedestrian accessibility to jobs differs when pedestrian distances are approximated with different networks that are more representative of reality. Stop-to-stop public transport travel times are extracted from an agent-based simulation of public transport smart card data. The effect of less-than-optimal connections from transit to the pedestrian network, a local measurement, can be seen when calculating the accessibility to all destinations in the city. We suggest moving away from Euclidean-based distance analyses. Limitations can be found in the data available; the connection of buildings to the network becomes important, as does the inclusion of pedestrian crossings. For an inclusive accessibility measure, it will be necessary to calculate generalized costs for pedestrians and generate different pedestrian networks that reflect the limitations of different user groups.


Ballester, M. G., Pérez, M. R., & Stuiver, J. (2011). Automatic Pedestrian Network Generation.

In AGILE 2011.

Bhat, C. R., Handy, S. L., Kockelman, K., Mahmassani, H. S., Gopal, A., Srour, I. M., & We-

ston, L. (2002). Development of an Urban Accessibility Index: Formulations, Aggregation,

and Application. Working Paper Report 7-4938-4, University of Texas Austin, Austin.

Borgers, A., Kemperman, A., & Timmermans, H. J. (2009). Modeling pedestrian movements

in shopping streets. In H. J. P. Timmermans (Ed.) Pedestrian Movement, chap. 5. Emerald

Group Publishing.

Byrd, A. (2012). Visualizing urban accessibility with OpenTripPlanner Analyst.


Chakirov, A., & Erath, A. (2012). Activity identification and primary location modelling based

on smart card payment data for public transport. In IATBR (Ed.) 13th International Confer-

ence on Travel Behaviour Research (IATBR). Toronto.

Choi, C. C., & Toh, R. (2010). Household interview surveys from 1997 to 2008: A decade of

changing travel behaviours. Journeys, 5(May 2010), 52–61.

Curtis, C., & Scheurer, J. (2010). Planning for sustainable accessibility: Developing tools to

aid discussion and decision-making. Progress in Planning, 74(2), 53–106.

Erath, A., Fourie, P. J., van Eggermond, M. A. B., Ordóñez Medina, S. A., Chakirov, A., &

Axhausen, K. W. (2012). Large-scale agent-based transport travel demand model for Singa-

pore. In IATBR (Ed.) 13th International Conference on Travel Behaviour Research (IATBR).


Ewing, R., & Cervero, R. (2010). Travel and the built environment. Journal of the American

Planning Association, 76(3), 265–294.

Geurs, K. T., & van Wee, B. (2004). Accessibility evaluation of land-use and transport strate-

gies: review and research directions. Journal of Transport Geography, 12(2), 127–140.

Hägerstrand, T. (1970). What about people in regional science? Papers of the Regional Science

Association, 24(1), 7–21.

Handy, S. L., & Clifton, K. J. (2001a). Evaluating neighborhood accessibility: Possibilities and

practicalities. Journal of Transportation and Statistics, (pp. 67–78).

Handy, S. L., & Clifton, K. J. (2001b). Local shopping as a strategy for reducing automobile

travel. Transportation, 28(4), 317–346.

Handy, S. L., & Niemeier, D. A. (1997). Measuring accessibility: an exploration of issues and

alternatives. Environment and Planning A, 29(7), 1175–1194.

Hansen, W. (1959). How Accessibility Shapes Land Use. Journal of the American Institute of

Planners, 25(2), 73–76.

Helbing, D., Farkás, I. J., & Vicsek, T. (2002). Crowd disasters and simulation of panic situa-

tions. In A. Bunde, J. Kropp, & H.-J. Schellnhuber (Eds.) The Science of Disasters. Climate

Disruptions, Heart Attacks, and Market Crashes, (pp. 334–354). Berlin: Springer.

Helbing, D., & Molnár, P. (1995). Social force model for pedestrian dynamics. Physical Review

E, 51(5), 4282–4286.

Hoogendoorn-Lanser, S., Schaap, N., & van de Waard, J. (2012). Policy Perspective on Acces-

sibility Measures : Assessment Framework and its Implications. In TRB (Ed.) 91st Annual

Meeting of the Transportation Research Board. Washington, D.C.: Transportation Research


Iacono, M., Krizek, K. J., & El-Geneidy, A. (2010). Measuring non-motorized accessibility:

issues, alternatives, and execution. Journal of Transport Geography, 18(1), 133–140.

Karimi, H. a., & Kasemsuppakorn, P. (2012). Pedestrian network map generation approaches

and recommendation. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, (April

, 1–16.

Kim, J., yong Park, S., Bang, Y., & Yu, K. (2009). Automatic derivation of a pedestrian network

based on existing spatial data sets. In ASPRS /MAPPS 2009 Fall Conference.

Kukla, R., Willis, A., & Kerridge, J. (2003). Application of context-mediated behavior to a

multi-agent pedestrian flow model (PEDFLOW). In TRB 2003.

Lee, B. H. Y., & Waddell, P. A. (2010). Reexamining the influence of work and nonwork

accessibility on residential location choices with a microanalytic framework. Environment

and Planning A, 42(4), 913–930.

Martínez, L. M., & Viegas, J. M. (2013). A new approach to modelling distance-decay functions

for accessibility assessment in transport studies. Journal of Transport Geography, 26, 87–96.

Molin, E. J. E., & Timmermans, H. J. P. (2003). Accessibility considerations in residential

choice decisions: Accumulated evidence from the Benelux. In TRB (Ed.) 82nd Annual

Meeting of the Transportation Research Board. Washington, D.C.: Transportation Research


Ordóñez Medina, S. A., & Erath, A. (2013). Estimating Dynamic Workplace Capacities by

Means of Public Transport Smart Card Data and Household Travel Survey in Singapore.

Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2344, 20–

Páez, A., Moniruzzaman, M., Bourbonnais, P.-L., & Morency, C. (2013). Developing a web-

based accessibility calculator prototype for the Greater Montreal Area. Transportation Re-

search Part A: Policy and Practice, 58, 103–115.

Parker, J. S., & Vanderslice, E. (2011). Pedestrian Network Analysis. In Walk21 Vancouver,

Reducing Road Dangers. Walk 21.

Penn, A., & Turner, A. (2001). Space Syntax Based Agent Simulation. In 1st International

Conference on Pedestrian and Evacuation Dynamics.

Schelhorn, T., O’Sullivan, D., Haklay, M., & Thurstain-Goodwin, M. (1999). Streets: An

agent-based pedestrian model.

Speck, J. (2012). Walkable City: How Downtown Can Save America, One Step At A Time. New

York: Farrar, Strauss and Giroux.

Streetdirectory Pte Ltd (2013). Streetdirectory.


Y.F. Tang, M., & S.C. Pun-Cheng, L. (2004). Algorithmic development of an optimal path

computation model based on topographic map features. In ISPRS 2004.




How to Cite

van Eggermond, M. A., & Erath, A. (2015). Pedestrian and transit accessibility on a micro level: Results and challenges. Journal of Transport and Land Use, 9(3).